Q) Allowance after abandonment after appeal (Variation on 10.03.38a)

April 5, 2010

Test takers report a variation of question #38 from the October 2003 (AM) patent bar exam is in the Prometric database. 38. Prosecution before the primary examiner results in the rejection of claim 1. Claim 2 was objected to as being allowable except for its dependency from claim 1. Independent claim 3 has been allowed. The rejection […]

10 comments Read the full post →

Q) ABCD/ABCDE/BCDE (10.03.2p)

April 3, 2010

Recent takers report that question #6 from the October 2003 (PM) test is in the Prometric database. 2. A U.S. patent was granted on May 8, 2001. The sole independent claim in the patent isdirected to a combination of elements ABCD. A registered practitioner filed a reissueapplication on April 11, 2003 to narrow sole independent […]

13 comments Read the full post →

Q) 3rd Party Submission – Japanese publication (10.03.10p)

April 3, 2010

Recent test takers report question #10 from the October 2003 (pm) exam is in the Patent Bar database of tested questions. 10. In accordance with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP, which of the following can a third party submit in a pending published application within two months from the […]

7 comments Read the full post →

Q) Application Data Sheet (ADS) (10.03.43p)

April 3, 2010

Recent test takers report question #43 from the October 2003 (pm) exam is in the Patent Bar database of tested questions. 43. Which of the following statement(s) is in accordance with patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP regarding filing of an Application Data Sheet (ADS) in the USPTO? (A) All non-provisional […]

1 comment Read the full post →

New Patent Bar Exam Questions and Study Guide

March 30, 2010

What you’ll find here at MyPatentBar.com: A collaborative community of like minded people studying for the patent bar exam. Information about the Prometric Computerized Exam A complete Study Guide covering the topics you need to know for the Patent Bar Exam Listing and discussion about Past Questions repeated on recent exams as reported by test takers Information and […]

71 comments Read the full post →

Q) 103 Prior Art (10.03.5a)

May 5, 2009

5. In accordance with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP, which of the following does not constitute prior art upon which a primary examiner could properly rely upon in making an obviousness rejection under 35 USC 103? (A) A U.S. patent in the applicant’s field of endeavor which was issued […]

4 comments Read the full post →

← Previous Entries

Next Entries →