Test takers report a #50 from the October 2003 (AM) patent bar exam is in the current question pool.
ANSWER: (D) is the most correct answer. 37 CFR § 1.75; MPEP § 608.01(n). As explained in MPEP § 608.01(n), under the heading “Multiple Dependent Claims,” subheading “Acceptable Multiple Dependent Claim Wording” the multiple dependent claim wording of new claims 16-27 is proper. See, for example, “any one of the preceding claims,” and “in any of claims 1-3 or 7-9.” 37 CFR § 1.75(c) states “For fee calculation purposes under § 1.16, a multiple dependent claim will be considered to be that number of claims to which direct reference is made therein.” Therefore, claims 16-27 would each have a claim value of eleven and the total number of claims for fee calculation is one hundred forty-seven (12 x 11 = 132 + 15 = 147). Answers (A) and (B) are incorrect because they are not the correct total. Answer (C) is incorrect because the multiple dependent claims have not been calculated in accordance with 37 CFR § 1.75. Answer (E) is incorrect because the question asks for the total after the amendment adding claims 16-27 has been entered.
Got this 6/19/12.
I don’t understand how the calculation is done. Why is the 11 multiplied by the 12 ? I understand how to get the 11 (27-16) but why it is multiplied by 12 and why is the 15 added to it. Help! I take the test in a few days!
claims 16 to 27 –> “12”
each of claims 16 to 27 depends on any of claims 5-15 –> “11”
“15” original claims
Thanks,Tony! I just made the error of subtracting them instead of the method you showed. It is crystal clear now.