<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for MyPatentBar.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:35:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Repeat Questions by MFB</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/repeat-questions/#comment-30554</link>
		<dc:creator>MFB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/repeat-questions/#comment-30554</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to add my thanks and appreciation as well.  See you on the other side, hopefully!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to add my thanks and appreciation as well.  See you on the other side, hopefully!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q) Smith Laminate (4.00.17a) by PCTearsOfJoy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/09/q65-smith-laminate/#comment-30527</link>
		<dc:creator>PCTearsOfJoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/09/q65-smith-laminate/#comment-30527</guid>
		<description>Got this verbatim 2/2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got this verbatim 2/2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q) Obviousness (MPEP 2100, In Progress) by Miranda</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/06/q6-obviousness/#comment-30522</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 03:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/06/q6-obviousness/#comment-30522</guid>
		<description>does anyone know where i can find a good outline of the ksr supplemental material?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone know where i can find a good outline of the ksr supplemental material?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q) Interviews (10.03.3a) by Miranda</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/15/q72-interviews-10033a/#comment-30521</link>
		<dc:creator>Miranda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/15/q72-interviews-10033a/#comment-30521</guid>
		<description>so both A and B are correct per mpep revision 8, correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so both A and B are correct per mpep revision 8, correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Repeat Questions by Aerie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/repeat-questions/#comment-30519</link>
		<dc:creator>Aerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 00:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/repeat-questions/#comment-30519</guid>
		<description>Thanks!  I hope I can write a good news like you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!  I hope I can write a good news like you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Repeat Questions by PCTearsOfJoy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/repeat-questions/#comment-30516</link>
		<dc:creator>PCTearsOfJoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/repeat-questions/#comment-30516</guid>
		<description>MFB,

The fact pattern didn&#039;t clue me in to those points. It was the answer choices. For example, the re-exam question had answer choices that went something like this: &quot;Which is correct according to the MPEP and rules and procedures...? (A) Requestor should file a re-exam request no later than Sept. 16, 2011 w/ enough evidence to support a substantial question of patentability; (B) Requestor should file a re-exam request no later than Sept. 16, 2012 w/ enough evidence to support a substantial question of patentability...&quot; 

Basically, the answer choices combined the substantial new question of patentability + likelihood of success standard + AIA effective date in various ways and required you to know what the correct standard was at what time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MFB,</p>
<p>The fact pattern didn&#8217;t clue me in to those points. It was the answer choices. For example, the re-exam question had answer choices that went something like this: &#8220;Which is correct according to the MPEP and rules and procedures&#8230;? (A) Requestor should file a re-exam request no later than Sept. 16, 2011 w/ enough evidence to support a substantial question of patentability; (B) Requestor should file a re-exam request no later than Sept. 16, 2012 w/ enough evidence to support a substantial question of patentability&#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p>Basically, the answer choices combined the substantial new question of patentability + likelihood of success standard + AIA effective date in various ways and required you to know what the correct standard was at what time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Repeat Questions by PCTearsOfJoy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/repeat-questions/#comment-30515</link>
		<dc:creator>PCTearsOfJoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/repeat-questions/#comment-30515</guid>
		<description>Yes, I used the new materials from the USPTO website. I read them over once and took notes on it. They are pretty straightforward and easy to remember. Key thing to remember are the dates that these new rules go into effect. Good luck tomorrow!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I used the new materials from the USPTO website. I read them over once and took notes on it. They are pretty straightforward and easy to remember. Key thing to remember are the dates that these new rules go into effect. Good luck tomorrow!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Repeat Questions by Aerie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/repeat-questions/#comment-30504</link>
		<dc:creator>Aerie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/repeat-questions/#comment-30504</guid>
		<description>Thanks and Congratulations, PCTearsOfJoy -- 
I am wondering if you used new updated patent ruls since the USPTO posted new rules -- I know the appeal part has been chagned significantly.  Please let me know -- I am taking the exam tomorrow :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks and Congratulations, PCTearsOfJoy &#8212;<br />
I am wondering if you used new updated patent ruls since the USPTO posted new rules &#8212; I know the appeal part has been chagned significantly.  Please let me know &#8212; I am taking the exam tomorrow <img src='http://mypatentbar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Repeat Questions by MFB</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/repeat-questions/#comment-30502</link>
		<dc:creator>MFB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/repeat-questions/#comment-30502</guid>
		<description>What in the fact pattern clued you to these points?  Did it mention a date?  Did it ask about the standard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What in the fact pattern clued you to these points?  Did it mention a date?  Did it ask about the standard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Q) Laurel, Abbot and Hardy (4.00.14a) by PCTearsOfJoy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/09/04/q-laurel-abbot-and-hardy-40014a/#comment-30491</link>
		<dc:creator>PCTearsOfJoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=758#comment-30491</guid>
		<description>Got this 2/2</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got this 2/2</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

