<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MyPatentBar.com &#187; MPEP 1600</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/category/mpep-1600/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:52:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Plant Patents (MPEP 1600)</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/plant-patents-mpep-1600/</link>
		<comments>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/plant-patents-mpep-1600/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 21:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentbar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MPEP 1600]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/plant-patents-mpep-1600/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Plant patents aren&#8217;t test frequently on the Prometric Patent Bar Exam.  Know the following highlights:

Must      be asexually reproduced
Bacteria      is not a plant
Only      one claim allowed
Two      color (if necessary) copies of drawings
Claim    [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p>Plant patents aren&#8217;t test frequently on the Prometric Patent Bar Exam.  Know the following highlights:</p>
<ul>
<li class="MsoNormal">Must      be asexually reproduced</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Bacteria      is not a plant</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Only      one claim allowed</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Two      color (if necessary) copies of drawings</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Claim      the plant, not the fruit of the plant</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">No      advertising allowed</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">No      maintenance fees</li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>1600: Plant Patents:</strong></p>
<ol type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal">What types of Plants can be      patented?
<ol type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal">Asexually propogating       plants are the only kind that may be patented. If a plant reproduces       exclusively via pollination/seeding it is <strong>not</strong> covered (Exception:       Some plants can reproduce both sexually &amp; asexually, they are allowed       for plant patents).</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Tubers (like Potatoes,       Jerusalem Artichokes) are <strong>not</strong> allowed to be patented.       &#8220;Tuber&#8221; is used in its horticultural sense.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">&#8220;Plant&#8221; is       not used in the strict scientific sense so single-cell organisms are not       considered &#8216;plants&#8217; even if they reproduce asexually.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Plants: It is possible       to get a utility patent (35 U.S.C. 101) on a plant instead of the plant       patent (35 U.S.C. 161) so plant patents are not exclusive to utility       patents (although you have to choose one or the other).</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Term: The term for plant      patents is the same as for utility patents: 20 years from the effective      filing date.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Elements of the patent:
<ol type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal">Description: The       description should have a complete description of the plant, and fully       describe the characteristics that make it different from other species of       plant or antecedents.
<ol type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal">The terms used should        be scientific botanical terms, not general terms seen in nursery guides.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">The <em>genus </em>and <em>species</em> name of the plant (in Latin, not genus &amp; species as in generic        claims) should be part of the ADS &amp; description (see 37 CFR 1.163)</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">As long as the plant        is mentioned, if the description of the plant turns out to be deficient,        the applicant is allowed to amend or even completely replace the        description to make it sufficient and <strong>this is not considered new        matter</strong>. (It would only be considered new matter if the description        were actually for a different plant than the one originally specified).</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Drawings: (37 CFR       1.165, 1.84):
<ol type="1">
<li class="MsoNormal">The drawings must be        complete and disclose all distinctive characteristics of the plant being        claimed (if those characteristics are capable of being visualized).</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Color: For plant        apps, color drawings are allowed with more freedom (no need to file 1.84        petitions). The applicant must provide 2 color copies of any color        drawings or photos of the plant. These copies are not required at the        filing date (only one original is needed to get a filing date) but        examination will not begin until the copies are given to the USPTO.        There is no 37 CFR 1.165 requirement for a B&amp;W photocopy of photos        on plant applications.</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">Specimens: The       applicant may be required to produce specimens that are at the correct       level of development for the office to examine.</li>
</ol>
</li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/plant-patents-mpep-1600/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

