<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MyPatentBar.com &#187; MPEP 0900</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/category/mpep-0900/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:52:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Prior Art, Classification and Search (MPEP 900)</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/14/prior-art-classification-and-search-mpep-900/</link>
		<comments>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/14/prior-art-classification-and-search-mpep-900/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 21:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>patentbar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[MPEP 0900]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/14/prior-art-classification-and-search-mpep-900/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Commercial review courses seldom cover material in MPEP Chapter 900 rationalizing that historically, this material is not tested on the Patent Bar Exam. Recent test takers have noted that the following subject matter from Chapter 900 does appear on the Prometric Patent Bar exam:
Overview
How do examiners search for prior art?

The examiner, upon understanding the invention [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;">Commercial review courses seldom cover material in MPEP Chapter 900 rationalizing that historically, this material is not tested on the Patent Bar Exam.<span> </span>Recent test takers have noted that the following subject matter from Chapter 900 does appear on the Prometric Patent Bar exam:</span></p>
<h2>Overview</h2>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em><span style="font-size:10pt;">How do examiners search for prior art?</span></em></p>
<ul>
<li><span style="font-size:10pt;">The examiner, upon understanding the invention disclosed and claimed in the application, searches the prior art which may be disclosed in patents and other published documents.<span> </span>Any such document used in the rejection of the claim is called a reference.<span> </span>[MPEP 904]</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:10pt;">In all Continuing Applications, the examiner should review the parent application and this fact should be made part of the record.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:10pt;">A first search should be adequate enough not to require a second search for priori art.<span> </span>A second search may be necessitated by amendments of to check priori art cited in the first PTO action subsequent to the initial prior art search.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:10pt;">In the first action on the merits of an application, the examiner shall make an initial endorsement, <span style="text-decoration:underline;">in black ink</span> on the file wrapper, of the classes and subclasses of domestic and foreign patents, abstract collections, and publication in which the search for prior art was made.<span> </span>The examiner must also identify other information collected and sources in which the search for prior art was made, and also indicate the date(s) on which the search was conducted.</span></li>
</ul>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="text-decoration:underline;"><span style="font-size:10pt;">General search guidelines </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;">Conducting a thorough search of the prior art requires three distinct steps by the examiner that are critical for a complete and thorough search: 1) identify the field of search, 2) selecting the proper tool(s) to perform the search (discretionary), and 3) determining the appropriate search strategy for each search tool selected (discretionary).</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;">Three Reference Sources Required &#8211; Determining the field of search the examiner must consider domestic patents (including patent application publications), foreign patent documents, and non-patent literature.<span> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><em><span style="font-size:10pt;">Conducting searches at the USPTO Office – </span></em></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;">A test taker reported the following answers to a question on the Prometric Patent Bar:</span></p>
<ol>
<li><span style="font-size:10pt;">displaying a user pass in the TC search facility</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:10pt;">removing patent publications from their shoes</span></li>
<li><span style="font-size:10pt;">re-shelving materials yourself or leave them for contract staff to handle</span></li>
<li>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>900: What are the sources that the Examiner will look at for Prior Art?</strong> (sort of an extension of material in 700):</p>
</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">1. Canceled matter in other      patents: Once matter is canceled it is not available under 102(e) (since      it is no longer part of a patent that actually gets granted). However, it      is still considered to be published prior art that is effective as of the <strong>publication      date</strong> of the app or patent, and it is therefore still available under      102(a).</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">2. Abandoned U.S.      applications: For abandoned apps that are actually published, the app is      available under 102(a),(b) as of the <strong>publication date.</strong> It is also      available under 102(e) as of the <strong>earliest effective filing date</strong>.      For abandoned apps that never get published, if the abandoned app is      referenced by another U.S.      app, it will become available as a public document and be available as      102(a)(b) prior art.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">3. Pending U.S.      applications: The pending app is available under 102(a)(b) as of the <strong>publication      date</strong>, and is available under 102(e) as of the <strong>earliest effective      filing date</strong>.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">4. Granted U.S.      Patents: Granted patents are effective under 102(a)(b) <strong>as of the date      of patenting</strong>, and under 102(e) as of the <strong>earliest effective filing      date.</strong> (One thing: could this mean that the 102(a)(b) date actually      changes from a pending app to the finally granted one???)</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">5. Foreign Patent Docs:      Foreign patents, or other publicly available foreign patent materials      (like patent apps that have been &#8216;laid open&#8217;) are all available under      102(a)(b) as of the date the material becomes public.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">6. Non-Patent Publications:      All printed publications are available as references as of their      publication date.</li>
<li class="MsoNormal">7. Published U.S.      Abstracts, Abbreviatures, &amp; Defensive Publications (Including SIRs):      All of these publications are available and may be used under 102(a)(b).</li>
</ol>
<ol></ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/14/prior-art-classification-and-search-mpep-900/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
