<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q) Public Use (10.03.47p)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2010/04/19/q-public-use-10-03-47p/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2010/04/19/q-public-use-10-03-47p/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sol</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2010/04/19/q-public-use-10-03-47p/#comment-30587</link>
		<dc:creator>Sol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/?p=1834#comment-30587</guid>
		<description>This question is test that you are not confused with relying on your act in a NAFTA or WTO country to establish a prior inveniton date. If you are on the defense side, you can use your own act in a NAFTA or WTO country (after certain effective dates) to beat some prior art. For examiner on the offense side, he/she cannot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This question is test that you are not confused with relying on your act in a NAFTA or WTO country to establish a prior inveniton date. If you are on the defense side, you can use your own act in a NAFTA or WTO country (after certain effective dates) to beat some prior art. For examiner on the offense side, he/she cannot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

