Q) Interview (4.03.19a)

by admin on April 10, 2010 · 3 comments

in Exam Questions

Question #19 from the April 2003 (AM) patent bar exam is reported by exam takers as a question in the current exam database.

19. Which of the following requests by the registered practitioner of record for an interview with an examiner concerning an application will be granted in accordance with proper USPTO rules and procedure?
(A) A request for an interview in a substitute application prior to the first Office action, for the examiner and attorney of record to meet in the practitioner’s office without the authority of the Commissioner.
(B) A request for an interview in a continued prosecution application prior to the first Office action, to be held in the examiner’s office.
(C) A request for an interview in a non-continuing and non-substitute application, prior to the first Office action to be held in the examiner’s office.
(D) All of the above.
(E) None of the above.


ANSWER: (B) is the most correct answer. 37 CFR § 1.133; MPEP § 713.02. As stated in MPEP § 713.02, “[a] request for an interview prior to the first Office action is ordinarily granted in continuing or substitute applications. A request for an interview in all other applications before the first action is untimely and will not be acknowledged if written, or granted if oral. 37 CFR 1.133(a).” (A) is incorrect because interview will not be permitted off Office premises without the authority of the Commissioner. 37 CFR § 1.133(a)(1). (C) is incorrect because an interview for the discussion of the patentability of a pending application will not occur before the first Office action, unless the application is a continuing or substitute application. 37 CFR § 1.133(a)(2). (D) is incorrect because (A) and (C) are incorrect. (E) is incorrect because (B) is correct.

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

1 ZephNo Gravatar April 27, 2011 at 6:18 pm

I think (C) will now qualify as a correct answer in light of MPEP Rev. 8.

The examiner can grant an interview in a noncontinuing or nonsubstitute application if the examiner determines that such an interview would advance prosecution of the application.

MPEP § 713.02 now states:
A request for an interview prior to the first Office action is ordinarily granted in continuing or substitute applications. In all other applications, an interview
before the first Office action **>is encouraged where< the examiner determines that such an interview would advance prosecution of the application.

Reply

2 PatfieldNo Gravatar June 30, 2011 at 12:06 pm

Thank you Zeph!

Reply

3 SolNo Gravatar March 31, 2012 at 4:36 pm

C is still not as good as B. The Examiner can still deny an interview before the 1st OA if he determines that such an interview would NOT advance prosecution of the application.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: