Saturday, April 3, 2010

Q) ABCD/ABCDE/BCDE (10.03.2p)

by admin on April 3, 2010 · 13 comments

in Uncategorized

Recent takers report that question #6 from the October 2003 (PM) test is in the Prometric database.
2. A U.S. patent was granted on May 8, 2001. The sole independent claim in the patent isdirected to a combination of elements ABCD. A registered practitioner filed a reissueapplication on April 11, 2003 to narrow sole independent claim. In the reissue application, theindependent claim is amended to a combination to elements ABCDE. The reissue application isaccompanied by a transmittal letter stating that the application was filed to narrow a claim, thatall inventors could not be located to sign the reissue oath or declaration at that time, and that adeclaration would be submitted in due course. No other amendments to the claims were filed onApril 11, 2003. On May 8, 2003, a declaration signed by all inventors is filed declaring that theyhad claimed less than they had a right to claim, and that the error arose without deceptive intent.The inventors also filed on May 8, 2003 a preliminary amendment deleting element A from thesole independent claim leaving elements BCDE. The amendment and declaration are filed usingthe provisions of 37 CFR 1.10. The practitioner included an authorization to charge thepractitioner’s deposit account for any necessary fees. Which of the following actions by theprimary the examiner in the first Office action is in accordance with the patent laws, rules andprocedures as related in the MPEP?(A) Reject all the claims based upon a broadening reissue outside the two yearstatutory period authorized by 35 USC 251 since applicant did not file abroadened reissue claim at the time of filing.(B) Reject all the claims based upon a broadening reissue outside the two yearstatutory period authorized by 35 USC 251 since applicant did not file a claim to abroadened reissue claim within the two year period set by 35 USC 251.(C) Reject all the claims based upon a broadening reissue outside the two yearstatutory period authorized by 35 USC 251 since applicant’s indication in thetransmittal letter indicated that the filing of the reissue application was anarrowing reissue and that the broadening amendment was not permissible even iffiled within the two-years from the grant of the original patent.(D) Determine that the application is a proper broadening reissue and perform anexamination and issue an Office action in due course.(E) Determine that the application is a proper broadening reissue and reject the claimsunder the recapture doctrine since the claims are broader than the issued claims.

ANSWER: (D) is the most correct answer. MPEP §§ 1403 and 1412.03, under the heading “When A Broadened Claim Can Be Presented.” A broadening reissue claim must be filed within the two years from the grant of the original patent. (D) is the most correct and the examiner should examine the case as any other application and address appropriate issues concerning reissue examination. See Switzer v. Sockman, 333 F.2d 935, 142 USPQ 226 (CCPA 1964) (a similar rule in interferences). Since applicant filed the amendment by Express Mail, the amendment is treated as being filed with the USPTO on the date of deposit with the US Postal Service. Therefore, (A), (B) and (C) are incorrect answers. A reissue application can be granted a filing date without an oath or declaration, or without the filing fee being present. See 37 CFR § 1.53(f). Applicant will be given a period of time to provide the missing parts and to pay the surcharge under 37 CFR § 1.16(e). See MPEP § 1410.01. Choice (E) is not correct since the mere deletion of an element of a claim does not automatically raise a ground of rejection based on the recapture doctrine. See MPEP § 1412.02.

{ 13 comments }

Q) 3rd Party Submission – Japanese publication (10.03.10p)

April 3, 2010

Recent test takers report question #10 from the October 2003 (pm) exam is in the Patent Bar database of tested questions. 10. In accordance with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP, which of the following can a third party submit in a pending published application within two months from the […]

7 comments Read the full post →

Q) Application Data Sheet (ADS) (10.03.43p)

April 3, 2010

Recent test takers report question #43 from the October 2003 (pm) exam is in the Patent Bar database of tested questions. 43. Which of the following statement(s) is in accordance with patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP regarding filing of an Application Data Sheet (ADS) in the USPTO? (A) All non-provisional […]

1 comment Read the full post →