Comments on: Q) Obviousness http://mypatentbar.com/2008/09/04/q-obviousness/ Patent Bar Review and Study Guide Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:43:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: S http://mypatentbar.com/2008/09/04/q-obviousness/#comment-2552 S Sat, 05 Jun 2010 11:06:08 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=828#comment-2552 I got this. Obvious. I got this.

Obvious.

]]> By: sambo http://mypatentbar.com/2008/09/04/q-obviousness/#comment-1503 sambo Sat, 12 Sep 2009 14:54:52 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=828#comment-1503 Got this question yesterday, but it was based of old exam with prior art range of 35-55 and applicant claimed 34.9-55.1 and unless they can show that this range has different properties it IS obvious because it is so close, Got this question yesterday, but it was based of old exam with prior art range of 35-55 and applicant claimed 34.9-55.1 and unless they can show that this range has different properties it IS obvious because it is so close,

]]>