Q) Obviousness

by patentbar on September 4, 2008 · 2 comments

in Exam Questions

Can an examiner make an obviousness rejection where prior art cites chemical amounts of 34.9% and the applicant’s range starts at 35%?

MPEP 2144.05 “A prima facie case of obviousness exists where the claimed ranges and the prior art ranges do not overlap but are close enough that one skilled in the art would have expected them to have the same properties.”

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

1 samboNo Gravatar September 12, 2009 at 10:54 am

Got this question yesterday, but it was based of old exam with prior art range of 35-55 and applicant claimed 34.9-55.1 and unless they can show that this range has different properties it IS obvious because it is so close,

Reply

2 SNo Gravatar June 5, 2010 at 7:06 am

I got this.

Obvious.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: