Comments on: Q) Obviousness (10.01.30a) http://mypatentbar.com/2008/09/04/q-obviousness-100130a/ Patent Bar Review and Study Guide Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:15:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Austin http://mypatentbar.com/2008/09/04/q-obviousness-100130a/#comment-8478 Austin Sun, 13 Mar 2011 00:08:59 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=801#comment-8478 Enablement is the requirement under 35 usc 112 first paragraph that says a person of ordinary skill in the art must be able to make and use the claimed invention without undue experimentation, after reading the specification. MPEP 2164. The policy goal of this requirement is to show that the applicant actually possessed the invention at the time of filing. And to clearly point out, to the public, the scope of the claimed invention -- to put the public on notice. Id. Enablement is the requirement under 35 usc 112 first paragraph that says a person of ordinary skill in the art must be able to make and use the claimed invention without undue experimentation, after reading the specification. MPEP 2164. The policy goal of this requirement is to show that the applicant actually possessed the invention at the time of filing. And to clearly point out, to the public, the scope of the claimed invention — to put the public on notice. Id.

]]> By: little yellow duck http://mypatentbar.com/2008/09/04/q-obviousness-100130a/#comment-7649 little yellow duck Wed, 16 Feb 2011 20:44:07 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=801#comment-7649 what is enablement? what is enablement?

]]> By: S http://mypatentbar.com/2008/09/04/q-obviousness-100130a/#comment-1561 S Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:28:33 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=801#comment-1561 reading the question in context with this comment makes a lot more sense. Thank you, reading the question in context with this comment makes a lot more sense.

Thank you,

]]> By: siriram http://mypatentbar.com/2008/09/04/q-obviousness-100130a/#comment-1477 siriram Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:36:45 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=801#comment-1477 ??????????????????????? ???????????????????????

]]> By: Big Tex http://mypatentbar.com/2008/09/04/q-obviousness-100130a/#comment-1476 Big Tex Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:28:48 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=801#comment-1476 Although not terribly necessary to answer the question, here is the first part that was missing: Kat Forrest has been a famous golf prodigy since childhood and currently enjoys phenomenal success on the professional golf tour, having won four straight major titles. Kat conceived, constructed and successfully tested a golfer’s aid to help less-skilled players. Briefly, the aid includes a distance-finder that determines the precise distance from the golfer’s ball to a target such as a fairway landing area or the hole. The aid obtains data concerning playing conditions (e.g., wind speed and direction, soil moisture, etc.) from a series of sensors distributed throughout a golf course. A global positioning system provides accurate positional coordinates for the ball location and the target location. A user interface allows manual input of situational data (e.g., ball in divot) and permits the user to override system settings and sensor data. The golfer’s aid also includes computer memory that stores performance data calibrated to a specific golfer. In use, a digital processor determines a suggested play based on playing conditions and golfer skill level, and automatically displays information concerning the suggested play (e.g., recommended golf club and preferred line of flight for the ball). Other information can be displayed in reply to user requests. Kat comes to you in September 2001 and asks you to prepare and file a patent application on her behalf. She informs you that she has shown the golfer’s aid only to her caddie and only under terms of strict confidentiality, and that she finalized the design on June 5, 2001. Her golfer’s aid has not been sold or offered for sale. She also informs you that she derived the general idea for the golfer’s aid, in part, from (1) an article appearing in the July 2000 edition of a golf magazine concerning a commercial distance finder and (2) a customized personal digital assistant (PDA) she saw on a store shelf while traveling in Thailand in April 2001. The distance finder has been available for sale in the United States since August 2000. The customized PDA was first offered for sale in the United States on June 8, 2001, but has not been disclosed in any publication or patent document. You prepare a patent application with claims that you believe are likely to be found patentably distinct over the commercially available distance finder and the golf magazine article, either alone or in combination. The application is filed with the USPTO on September 17, 2001. Although not terribly necessary to answer the question, here is the first part that was missing:

Kat Forrest has been a famous golf prodigy since childhood and currently enjoys phenomenal success on the professional golf tour, having won four straight major titles. Kat conceived, constructed and successfully tested a golfer’s aid to help less-skilled players. Briefly, the aid includes a distance-finder that determines the precise distance from the golfer’s ball to a target such as a fairway landing area or the hole. The aid obtains data concerning playing conditions (e.g., wind speed and direction, soil moisture, etc.) from a series of sensors distributed throughout a golf course. A global positioning system provides accurate positional coordinates for the ball location and the target location. A user interface allows manual input of situational data (e.g., ball in divot) and permits the user to override system settings and sensor data. The golfer’s aid also includes computer memory that stores performance data calibrated to a specific golfer. In use, a digital processor determines a suggested play based on playing conditions and golfer skill level, and automatically displays information concerning the suggested play (e.g., recommended golf club and preferred line of flight for the ball). Other information can be displayed in reply to user requests.

Kat comes to you in September 2001 and asks you to prepare and file a patent application on her behalf. She informs you that she has shown the golfer’s aid only to her caddie and only under terms of strict confidentiality, and that she finalized the design on June 5, 2001. Her golfer’s aid has not been sold or offered for sale. She also informs you that she derived the general idea for the golfer’s aid, in part, from (1) an article appearing in the July 2000 edition of a golf magazine concerning a commercial distance finder and (2) a customized personal digital assistant (PDA) she saw on a store shelf while traveling in Thailand in April 2001. The distance finder has been available for sale in the United States since August 2000. The customized PDA was first offered for sale in the United States on June 8, 2001, but has not been disclosed in any publication or patent document. You prepare a patent application with claims that you believe are likely to be found patentably distinct over the commercially available distance finder and the golf magazine article, either alone or in combination. The application is filed with the USPTO on September 17, 2001.

]]>