Comments on: Q) Jack and Jill in Vietnam (4.01.40a) http://mypatentbar.com/2008/09/04/q-jack-and-jill-in-vietnam-40140a/ Patent Bar Review and Study Guide Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:15:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Number_27 http://mypatentbar.com/2008/09/04/q-jack-and-jill-in-vietnam-40140a/#comment-4813 Number_27 Tue, 23 Nov 2010 20:15:03 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=781#comment-4813 "The life of the law is not logic, but experience" (something to that effect) O.W. Holmes follow toomuch23's advice “The life of the law is not logic, but experience” (something to that effect)

O.W. Holmes

follow toomuch23’s advice

]]> By: toomuch23 http://mypatentbar.com/2008/09/04/q-jack-and-jill-in-vietnam-40140a/#comment-4460 toomuch23 Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:57:13 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=781#comment-4460 Not that you are reading this, but forget the logic, pass the test, than, if so inclined, persuade the legislature to change the statute:) Not that you are reading this, but forget the logic, pass the test, than, if so inclined, persuade the legislature to change the statute:)

]]> By: S http://mypatentbar.com/2008/09/04/q-jack-and-jill-in-vietnam-40140a/#comment-1560 S Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:17:11 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=781#comment-1560 When I read the question, I thought on similar lines too. Is it possible in real life? When I read the question, I thought on similar lines too.

Is it possible in real life?

]]> By: Sean http://mypatentbar.com/2008/09/04/q-jack-and-jill-in-vietnam-40140a/#comment-1455 Sean Fri, 17 Apr 2009 01:20:05 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=781#comment-1455 What if no photo was taken in Vietnam? What if they hadn't divorced? Jack would have gotten away with the patent unless the Vietnamese man came to know about it, came to the US, and sued Jack. Is that a correct assumption of possible events? I am just trying to understand the actual logic behind otherwise "arbitrary" laws. Thank you. What if no photo was taken in Vietnam? What if they hadn’t divorced? Jack would have gotten away with the patent unless the Vietnamese man came to know about it, came to the US, and sued Jack. Is that a correct assumption of possible events? I am just trying to understand the actual logic behind otherwise “arbitrary” laws. Thank you.

]]>