Comments on: Q) Maintenance Fee Paid / Check Returned http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/19/q-maintenance-fee-paid-check-returned/ Patent Bar Review and Study Guide Wed, 08 Sep 2010 20:43:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: S http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/19/q-maintenance-fee-paid-check-returned/#comment-2540 S Sat, 05 Jun 2010 10:40:09 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=580#comment-2540 I got this yesterday. 1.377: (c) Any petition filed under this section must comply with the requirements of § 1.181(b) and must be signed by an attorney or agent registered to practice before the Patent and Trademark Office, or by the patentee, the assignee, or other party in interest. I got this yesterday.

1.377:
(c)
Any petition filed under this section must comply with the requirements of § 1.181(b) and must be signed by an attorney or agent registered to practice before the Patent and Trademark Office, or by the patentee, the assignee, or other party in interest.

]]> By: John Doe http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/19/q-maintenance-fee-paid-check-returned/#comment-1385 John Doe Wed, 08 Apr 2009 17:30:32 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=580#comment-1385 Had a maintenance fee question where the check was mailed without ANY identifying information for the patent so the check was not applied. In this situation (no information whatsoever) I don't believe you can use 1.377 . I think all but one answer discussed what needed to be filed to complete the 1.377 petition. Had a maintenance fee question where the check was mailed without ANY identifying information for the patent so the check was not applied. In this situation (no information whatsoever) I don’t believe you can use 1.377 . I think all but one answer discussed what needed to be filed to complete the 1.377 petition.

]]>