<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q) Maintenance Fee Paid / Check Returned</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/19/q-maintenance-fee-paid-check-returned/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/19/q-maintenance-fee-paid-check-returned/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bagelman</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/19/q-maintenance-fee-paid-check-returned/#comment-29486</link>
		<dc:creator>Bagelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=580#comment-29486</guid>
		<description>Got this on 1/18/12/.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got this on 1/18/12/.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/19/q-maintenance-fee-paid-check-returned/#comment-22686</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 15:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=580#comment-22686</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused about E. 

37 CFR 1.378. Acceptance of delayed payment of maintenance fee in expired patent to reinstate patent.
(a)The Director may accept the payment of any maintenance
fee due on a patent after expiration of the patent if, upon petition, the delay in payment of the maintenance fee is shown to the satisfaction of the Director to have been unavoidable (paragraph
(b) of this section) or unintentional (paragraph (c) of this section) and if the surcharge required by § 1.20(i) is paid as a condition
of accepting payment of the maintenance fee.

So you can pay the maintenance fee and surcharge after expiration?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused about E. </p>
<p>37 CFR 1.378. Acceptance of delayed payment of maintenance fee in expired patent to reinstate patent.<br />
(a)The Director may accept the payment of any maintenance<br />
fee due on a patent after expiration of the patent if, upon petition, the delay in payment of the maintenance fee is shown to the satisfaction of the Director to have been unavoidable (paragraph<br />
(b) of this section) or unintentional (paragraph (c) of this section) and if the surcharge required by § 1.20(i) is paid as a condition<br />
of accepting payment of the maintenance fee.</p>
<p>So you can pay the maintenance fee and surcharge after expiration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/19/q-maintenance-fee-paid-check-returned/#comment-18045</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=580#comment-18045</guid>
		<description>petition [under §1.377]  refusal of maintenance fee
1. Must be filed within two months of the action complained 
2. Must include the patent number, AND application number, if not both may or may not be entered --&gt; option to Petition director 1.377
3. Petition is NOT appropriate where there is a (1) complete failure to include at least one correct mandatory identifier  (2) through error identified the wrong patent number and application number (3) Insufficient payment 
4. Petition is ok  (appropriate) when either the patent number or the application number is incorrect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>petition [under §1.377]  refusal of maintenance fee<br />
1. Must be filed within two months of the action complained<br />
2. Must include the patent number, AND application number, if not both may or may not be entered &#8211;&gt; option to Petition director 1.377<br />
3. Petition is NOT appropriate where there is a (1) complete failure to include at least one correct mandatory identifier  (2) through error identified the wrong patent number and application number (3) Insufficient payment<br />
4. Petition is ok  (appropriate) when either the patent number or the application number is incorrect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacquiegardner</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/19/q-maintenance-fee-paid-check-returned/#comment-10340</link>
		<dc:creator>jacquiegardner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 23:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=580#comment-10340</guid>
		<description>Got this question today.  Pretty sure I got the right answer, C.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got this question today.  Pretty sure I got the right answer, C.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overworkked</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/19/q-maintenance-fee-paid-check-returned/#comment-10101</link>
		<dc:creator>Overworkked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=580#comment-10101</guid>
		<description>I had this question on 4/27/2011 with very sparse facts that added extra facts in the answer:

QUESTION:

Patentee Z had maintenance payment due.  Sent check.  PTO did not credit Z&#039;s patent.  

Which does or does not comply with the MPEP, laws, regulations, etc.?

A. something
B. something else
C. Any petition filed under this section 1.377 must comply with the requirements of § 1.181(b) and must be signed by an attorney or agent registered to practice before the Patent and Trademark Office, or by the patentee, the assignee, or other party in interest.   (Important to know if TRUE)
D. something else
E. Must pay Maintenance Fee before expiration but can pay surcharge later (False, must pay both up front per ??). 

MPEP on Maint.Fees was important
so was CFR 1.377</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had this question on 4/27/2011 with very sparse facts that added extra facts in the answer:</p>
<p>QUESTION:</p>
<p>Patentee Z had maintenance payment due.  Sent check.  PTO did not credit Z&#8217;s patent.  </p>
<p>Which does or does not comply with the MPEP, laws, regulations, etc.?</p>
<p>A. something<br />
B. something else<br />
C. Any petition filed under this section 1.377 must comply with the requirements of § 1.181(b) and must be signed by an attorney or agent registered to practice before the Patent and Trademark Office, or by the patentee, the assignee, or other party in interest.   (Important to know if TRUE)<br />
D. something else<br />
E. Must pay Maintenance Fee before expiration but can pay surcharge later (False, must pay both up front per ??). </p>
<p>MPEP on Maint.Fees was important<br />
so was CFR 1.377</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interen</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/19/q-maintenance-fee-paid-check-returned/#comment-9097</link>
		<dc:creator>Interen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=580#comment-9097</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think 37 CFR 1.5a applies to maintenance fee submission, since it concerns a application instead of a patent. On the contrary, CFR 1.5b specifies to follow 1.366c for maintenance fee payment. So no 2-weeks clause here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think 37 CFR 1.5a applies to maintenance fee submission, since it concerns a application instead of a patent. On the contrary, CFR 1.5b specifies to follow 1.366c for maintenance fee payment. So no 2-weeks clause here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patenttips</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/19/q-maintenance-fee-paid-check-returned/#comment-8662</link>
		<dc:creator>patenttips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 20:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=580#comment-8662</guid>
		<description>Complete failure, basically you sent a blank check to PTO, means you&#039;re SOL.

If you mess up something, but you tried, and payment was returned, then you can petition within 2 months.

My only question is do you still need to petition if you reply to returned check within two weeks (See original comments that give a 2 week period for reply).  Hence replies from returned check 0 - 2 weeks are ok, 2 weeks - 2 months require petition.  If you wrote the blank check or &gt;2 months then you lost your patent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Complete failure, basically you sent a blank check to PTO, means you&#8217;re SOL.</p>
<p>If you mess up something, but you tried, and payment was returned, then you can petition within 2 months.</p>
<p>My only question is do you still need to petition if you reply to returned check within two weeks (See original comments that give a 2 week period for reply).  Hence replies from returned check 0 &#8211; 2 weeks are ok, 2 weeks &#8211; 2 months require petition.  If you wrote the blank check or &gt;2 months then you lost your patent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PHOSITA</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/19/q-maintenance-fee-paid-check-returned/#comment-8384</link>
		<dc:creator>PHOSITA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2011 19:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=580#comment-8384</guid>
		<description>John Doe seems correct per MPEP 2580 :
&quot;A petition under 37 CFR 1.377 would not be appropriate where there is a complete failure to include at least one correct mandatory identifier as required by 37 CFR 1.366(c) for the patent since no evidence would be present as to the patent on which the maintenance fee was intended to be paid.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John Doe seems correct per MPEP 2580 :<br />
&#8220;A petition under 37 CFR 1.377 would not be appropriate where there is a complete failure to include at least one correct mandatory identifier as required by 37 CFR 1.366(c) for the patent since no evidence would be present as to the patent on which the maintenance fee was intended to be paid.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ELS</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/19/q-maintenance-fee-paid-check-returned/#comment-8280</link>
		<dc:creator>ELS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 17:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=580#comment-8280</guid>
		<description>Had this question yesterday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had this question yesterday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/19/q-maintenance-fee-paid-check-returned/#comment-6878</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=580#comment-6878</guid>
		<description>I got the same question as Anne today on my exam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the same question as Anne today on my exam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

