Comments on: Q) Indefinite Claim using 'high' http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/indefinite-claim-using-high/ Patent Bar Review and Study Guide Tue, 22 May 2012 00:33:43 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: KillianRed http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/indefinite-claim-using-high/#comment-35060 KillianRed Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:53:50 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=526#comment-35060 Got this on 3/17/12 Got this on 3/17/12

]]> By: Anna http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/indefinite-claim-using-high/#comment-33949 Anna Wed, 07 Mar 2012 21:39:41 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=526#comment-33949 Had this one on 02/04/12 Had this one on 02/04/12

]]> By: Alfredo http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/indefinite-claim-using-high/#comment-29822 Alfredo Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:48:23 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=526#comment-29822 Got this one 1/23/12 Got this one 1/23/12

]]> By: Remanded http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/indefinite-claim-using-high/#comment-29519 Remanded Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:39:12 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=526#comment-29519 Saw this question 20 January 2012. Saw this question 20 January 2012.

]]> By: Bagelman http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/indefinite-claim-using-high/#comment-29487 Bagelman Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:03:47 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=526#comment-29487 Got this 1/18/12. Got this 1/18/12.

]]> By: ChemEEE http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/indefinite-claim-using-high/#comment-21876 ChemEEE Wed, 09 Nov 2011 23:30:55 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=526#comment-21876 got this 11/7/11 chose same answer as Jamecam got this 11/7/11
chose same answer as Jamecam

]]> By: Jamecam http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/indefinite-claim-using-high/#comment-19421 Jamecam Mon, 31 Oct 2011 03:14:16 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=526#comment-19421 I got this question on 10/29/2011. The correct answer is that the term "high" is not necessarily indefinite because relative terminology is acceptable if a person of ordinary skill would understand what the term means based on the description in the specification and the understanding in the art. I got this question on 10/29/2011.

The correct answer is that the term “high” is not necessarily indefinite because relative terminology is acceptable if a person of ordinary skill would understand what the term means based on the description in the specification and the understanding in the art.

]]> By: Remanded http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/indefinite-claim-using-high/#comment-16035 Remanded Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:57:27 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=526#comment-16035 Got this one today, 18 September 2011. Got this one today, 18 September 2011.

]]> By: maggie http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/indefinite-claim-using-high/#comment-14804 maggie Fri, 26 Aug 2011 04:11:51 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=526#comment-14804 got this 8/24 got this 8/24

]]> By: Bob http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/indefinite-claim-using-high/#comment-13947 Bob Wed, 03 Aug 2011 06:05:52 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=526#comment-13947 Got this on 8/2/11 Got this on 8/2/11

]]>