<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q) 2 Month Rule for Final Office Action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/2-month-rule-for-final-office-action/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/2-month-rule-for-final-office-action/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 00:33:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mattz</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/2-month-rule-for-final-office-action/#comment-38322</link>
		<dc:creator>Mattz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 03:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-38322</guid>
		<description>You are right! here is the text from 706.07
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).

A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.

It only applies to Amendment/Reply not NOA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right! here is the text from 706.07<br />
THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a).</p>
<p>A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action.</p>
<p>It only applies to Amendment/Reply not NOA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sol</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/2-month-rule-for-final-office-action/#comment-37685</link>
		<dc:creator>Sol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 03:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-37685</guid>
		<description>Notice of Appeal is not really a reply to the final OA, so under the NEW rules, NOA tolls the SSP and the 2-month rule no longer controls. So the Answer should be C now.

Under old rules, NOA does not toll the SSP, so 2-month rule controls, the Answer is D

But if you file arguement/amendment as a reply to the final OA, I believe the 2-month rule still controls.

I hope the answer is updated in the database.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice of Appeal is not really a reply to the final OA, so under the NEW rules, NOA tolls the SSP and the 2-month rule no longer controls. So the Answer should be C now.</p>
<p>Under old rules, NOA does not toll the SSP, so 2-month rule controls, the Answer is D</p>
<p>But if you file arguement/amendment as a reply to the final OA, I believe the 2-month rule still controls.</p>
<p>I hope the answer is updated in the database.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drobEnereeret</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/2-month-rule-for-final-office-action/#comment-37004</link>
		<dc:creator>drobEnereeret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 08:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-37004</guid>
		<description>Gratifying To Our Crammer Hobby Factory.Save Up To 89% Off.Cheapest Tutor Purses  In Our Guide Factory. Decide Your Master Discounts School Bags As Your Original Opulence Gift. We Assure Luxurious Distinction,Fast Childbirth!Free Shopping! 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coachbagsfactoryjp.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;コーチバッグ&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coachbagsfactoryjp.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;コーチ財布&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coachbagsfactoryjp.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;コーチファクトリー&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gratifying To Our Crammer Hobby Factory.Save Up To 89% Off.Cheapest Tutor Purses  In Our Guide Factory. Decide Your Master Discounts School Bags As Your Original Opulence Gift. We Assure Luxurious Distinction,Fast Childbirth!Free Shopping!<br />
<a href="http://www.coachbagsfactoryjp.com/" rel="nofollow">コーチバッグ</a><br />
<a href="http://www.coachbagsfactoryjp.com/" rel="nofollow">コーチ財布</a><br />
<a href="http://www.coachbagsfactoryjp.com/" rel="nofollow">コーチファクトリー</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tindinarl</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/2-month-rule-for-final-office-action/#comment-37003</link>
		<dc:creator>tindinarl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 08:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-37003</guid>
		<description>If you lack to pay off letters requisition is mesh of afford up, the store goods of bags and purses (Exercise) Tutor Purse,coach luggage, prepare purse,coach, COACH.Offer discerning pilot to the top of the effective win legitimate (trainer) Escape USA OMNIBUS! In unrestricted shipping.Are also available in search offering wrapping. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coachhandbagsrjp.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;コーチ長財布&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coachhandbagsrjp.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;バッグコーチ&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.coachhandbagsrjp.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;コーチ財布&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you lack to pay off letters requisition is mesh of afford up, the store goods of bags and purses (Exercise) Tutor Purse,coach luggage, prepare purse,coach, COACH.Offer discerning pilot to the top of the effective win legitimate (trainer) Escape USA OMNIBUS! In unrestricted shipping.Are also available in search offering wrapping.<br />
<a href="http://www.coachhandbagsrjp.com/" rel="nofollow">コーチ長財布</a><br />
<a href="http://www.coachhandbagsrjp.com/" rel="nofollow">バッグコーチ</a><br />
<a href="http://www.coachhandbagsrjp.com/" rel="nofollow">コーチ財布</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RenioseCile</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/2-month-rule-for-final-office-action/#comment-36705</link>
		<dc:creator>RenioseCile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 05:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-36705</guid>
		<description>Fashionable Chanel consort with dog, variation of styles. Unencumbered shipping correspondence conduct consequence of turbulent quality Chanel purse. Appropriate quality! Chanel Chanel website here Unshackled Shipping most understandable for twopence Chanel attach?case and purse. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chanelbagjp.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;シャネル専門店&lt;/a&gt;  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chanelbagjp.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;シャネル バッグ&lt;/a&gt;  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chanelbagjp.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;シャネル&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fashionable Chanel consort with dog, variation of styles. Unencumbered shipping correspondence conduct consequence of turbulent quality Chanel purse. Appropriate quality! Chanel Chanel website here Unshackled Shipping most understandable for twopence Chanel attach?case and purse.<br />
<a href="http://www.chanelbagjp.org/" rel="nofollow">シャネル専門店</a><br />
<a href="http://www.chanelbagjp.org/" rel="nofollow">シャネル バッグ</a><br />
<a href="http://www.chanelbagjp.org/" rel="nofollow">シャネル</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unsanisug</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/2-month-rule-for-final-office-action/#comment-36420</link>
		<dc:creator>Unsanisug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 02:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-36420</guid>
		<description>Chanel carry-on luggage,coco Chanel,Chanel gift,official WEB site privileged department store &quot;Chanel&quot; name-brand clothes and bags &#124; Chanel purse,coco Chanel,Chanel award,CHANEL. Enchiridion (online shop),of your grip,such as mail not cricket c out of commission trust in guide. 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chanelbagsrjp.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;シャネルバッグ&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chanelbagsrjp.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;cocoシャネル&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chanelbagsrjp.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;財布 シャネル&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chanel carry-on luggage,coco Chanel,Chanel gift,official WEB site privileged department store &#8220;Chanel&#8221; name-brand clothes and bags | Chanel purse,coco Chanel,Chanel award,CHANEL. Enchiridion (online shop),of your grip,such as mail not cricket c out of commission trust in guide.<br />
<a href="http://www.chanelbagsrjp.com/" rel="nofollow">シャネルバッグ</a><br />
<a href="http://www.chanelbagsrjp.com/" rel="nofollow">cocoシャネル</a><br />
<a href="http://www.chanelbagsrjp.com/" rel="nofollow">財布 シャネル</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bagelman</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/2-month-rule-for-final-office-action/#comment-29489</link>
		<dc:creator>Bagelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 17:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-29489</guid>
		<description>Got this 1/18/12.

Watch out for variants.  I almost went with the advisory date as the date resetting the deadline but then I looked and saw that the date the advisory action was sent was BEFORE the three month statutory period was up.  In that case, the deadline for responding without any fees is the end of the statutory period, not the advisory date.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got this 1/18/12.</p>
<p>Watch out for variants.  I almost went with the advisory date as the date resetting the deadline but then I looked and saw that the date the advisory action was sent was BEFORE the three month statutory period was up.  In that case, the deadline for responding without any fees is the end of the statutory period, not the advisory date.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/2-month-rule-for-final-office-action/#comment-20285</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 23:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-20285</guid>
		<description>Ahhh...shortened statutory period. Thank you Greg for your easy to understand explanation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahhh&#8230;shortened statutory period. Thank you Greg for your easy to understand explanation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/2-month-rule-for-final-office-action/#comment-20284</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 23:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-20284</guid>
		<description>What does SSP stand for? Did the law change for this rule?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What does SSP stand for? Did the law change for this rule?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/07/2-month-rule-for-final-office-action/#comment-17376</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 21:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=513#comment-17376</guid>
		<description>D is the answer! 

MPEP 710.02(e), under the heading &quot;Final Rejection-Time For Reply&quot; states, &quot;if an applicant initially replies within 2 months from the date of mailing of any final rejection setting a 3 month shortened statutory period for reply and the Office does not mail an Advisory Action until AFTER the end of the 3 month shortened statutory period, the period for reply for purposes of determining the amount of any extension fee will be the date on which the Office mails the Advisory Action advising the applicant of the status of the application...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D is the answer! </p>
<p>MPEP 710.02(e), under the heading &#8220;Final Rejection-Time For Reply&#8221; states, &#8220;if an applicant initially replies within 2 months from the date of mailing of any final rejection setting a 3 month shortened statutory period for reply and the Office does not mail an Advisory Action until AFTER the end of the 3 month shortened statutory period, the period for reply for purposes of determining the amount of any extension fee will be the date on which the Office mails the Advisory Action advising the applicant of the status of the application&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

