<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q) Death of inventor before application is filed (MPEP 400)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/q-death-of-inventor-before-application-is-filed-mpep-400/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/q-death-of-inventor-before-application-is-filed-mpep-400/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alfredo</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/q-death-of-inventor-before-application-is-filed-mpep-400/#comment-29823</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfredo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=435#comment-29823</guid>
		<description>I got the variant where patent attorney was assigned a partial interest.  Question was essentially can he keep prosecuting the application or does he need new power of attorney from heirs/representatives etc.  
1/23/12</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the variant where patent attorney was assigned a partial interest.  Question was essentially can he keep prosecuting the application or does he need new power of attorney from heirs/representatives etc.<br />
1/23/12</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lily</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/q-death-of-inventor-before-application-is-filed-mpep-400/#comment-24760</link>
		<dc:creator>lily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Dec 2011 21:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=435#comment-24760</guid>
		<description>Maggie,
who is Ben and where can i see more of his questions? thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maggie,<br />
who is Ben and where can i see more of his questions? thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/q-death-of-inventor-before-application-is-filed-mpep-400/#comment-22330</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=435#comment-22330</guid>
		<description>Another Q reported from Ben from VA:

(Q) Both inventors die, after notice of allowance, but before it reaches the registered practitioner. 
Answer – Board cannot withdraw the application unless the heirs intervene. (The wording was much more confusing than that).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Q reported from Ben from VA:</p>
<p>(Q) Both inventors die, after notice of allowance, but before it reaches the registered practitioner.<br />
Answer – Board cannot withdraw the application unless the heirs intervene. (The wording was much more confusing than that).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/q-death-of-inventor-before-application-is-filed-mpep-400/#comment-22329</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=435#comment-22329</guid>
		<description>Maybe same as Ben reported from VA: 

(Q) Alvin and Bert – Alvin dies. The key here is the application was made by a registered practitioner. Therefore, power of attorney does not leave Bert and there’s no problem. Nothing needs to be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe same as Ben reported from VA: </p>
<p>(Q) Alvin and Bert – Alvin dies. The key here is the application was made by a registered practitioner. Therefore, power of attorney does not leave Bert and there’s no problem. Nothing needs to be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patentgeekchick</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/q-death-of-inventor-before-application-is-filed-mpep-400/#comment-16232</link>
		<dc:creator>patentgeekchick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=435#comment-16232</guid>
		<description>Got overworked&#039;s variant 9.22.11</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got overworked&#8217;s variant 9.22.11</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PB</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/q-death-of-inventor-before-application-is-filed-mpep-400/#comment-12654</link>
		<dc:creator>PB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 14:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=435#comment-12654</guid>
		<description>Does assignment also terminate upon the death of the inventor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does assignment also terminate upon the death of the inventor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/q-death-of-inventor-before-application-is-filed-mpep-400/#comment-10987</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 20:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=435#comment-10987</guid>
		<description>Got a dead inventor question today 5/18/11.

Involved power of attorney. Question was inventor died, but had given part interest to his attorney to pay practitioner fees. Correct answer is attorney can continue to prosecute and power of attorney not revoked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got a dead inventor question today 5/18/11.</p>
<p>Involved power of attorney. Question was inventor died, but had given part interest to his attorney to pay practitioner fees. Correct answer is attorney can continue to prosecute and power of attorney not revoked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah W.</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/q-death-of-inventor-before-application-is-filed-mpep-400/#comment-10466</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah W.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 May 2011 00:57:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=435#comment-10466</guid>
		<description>Corp Z has no need to revoke because POA terminates upon the inventor&#039;s death. A is correct. B is wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Corp Z has no need to revoke because POA terminates upon the inventor&#8217;s death. A is correct. B is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overworkked</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/q-death-of-inventor-before-application-is-filed-mpep-400/#comment-10103</link>
		<dc:creator>Overworkked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=435#comment-10103</guid>
		<description>VARIANT on 4/27/2011 E8R8:

Applicant gives full power of attorney to patent atty.  Files and assigns application in full to Corp. Z.  Applicant dies.  What now?

A. Executor of estate may file papers and continue until Corp. Z revokes (My Answer)
B. Corp. Z may revoke (Which is also true, but A is a MPEP quasi-quote)
C. something
D. something
E. something else

The delineation between A &amp; B was REALLY fine.  Both were equally valid in my view, but A was the MPEP extract, so I went with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VARIANT on 4/27/2011 E8R8:</p>
<p>Applicant gives full power of attorney to patent atty.  Files and assigns application in full to Corp. Z.  Applicant dies.  What now?</p>
<p>A. Executor of estate may file papers and continue until Corp. Z revokes (My Answer)<br />
B. Corp. Z may revoke (Which is also true, but A is a MPEP quasi-quote)<br />
C. something<br />
D. something<br />
E. something else</p>
<p>The delineation between A &amp; B was REALLY fine.  Both were equally valid in my view, but A was the MPEP extract, so I went with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patenttips</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/q-death-of-inventor-before-application-is-filed-mpep-400/#comment-8840</link>
		<dc:creator>patenttips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=435#comment-8840</guid>
		<description>also saw question: inventor appoints atty partial assignee, inventor dies.

partial assignee may continue prosecution</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also saw question: inventor appoints atty partial assignee, inventor dies.</p>
<p>partial assignee may continue prosecution</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

