<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q) Terminal Disclaimer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 15:35:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-22305</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-22305</guid>
		<description>Another Q was reported on Exam on How to Correct a terminal disclaimer: 

Answer: Allow app, then applicant files reissue to correct terminal disclaimer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Q was reported on Exam on How to Correct a terminal disclaimer: </p>
<p>Answer: Allow app, then applicant files reissue to correct terminal disclaimer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-22304</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-22304</guid>
		<description>Terminal Disclaimer can be signed by: 
(i)by the applicant, or
(ii)if there is an assignee of record of an undivided part interest, by the applicant and such assignee, or
(iii)if there is an assignee of record of the entire interest,
by such assignee, or
(iv)by an attorney or agent of record;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terminal Disclaimer can be signed by:<br />
(i)by the applicant, or<br />
(ii)if there is an assignee of record of an undivided part interest, by the applicant and such assignee, or<br />
(iii)if there is an assignee of record of the entire interest,<br />
by such assignee, or<br />
(iv)by an attorney or agent of record;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-16199</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-16199</guid>
		<description>My take on this as well. Seems exceedingly clear to me. Somebody prove this wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My take on this as well. Seems exceedingly clear to me. Somebody prove this wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-13948</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 06:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-13948</guid>
		<description>Same as Sarah on 8/2/11</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same as Sarah on 8/2/11</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigBadVoodoDaddy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-12721</link>
		<dc:creator>BigBadVoodoDaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 19:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-12721</guid>
		<description>undivided part interest applies when a corporation may assign some ownership to a sub division.
eg. if a corporation has 50 % ownership. Division A can own 25 % and the parent can own 25 %. In this case the part interest is divided. hence both corporation and its division A have to participate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>undivided part interest applies when a corporation may assign some ownership to a sub division.<br />
eg. if a corporation has 50 % ownership. Division A can own 25 % and the parent can own 25 %. In this case the part interest is divided. hence both corporation and its division A have to participate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-10990</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 20:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-10990</guid>
		<description>Something involving disclaimers today. I believe it was who can sign for them (all inventors or all with interest).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something involving disclaimers today. I believe it was who can sign for them (all inventors or all with interest).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: H</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-9100</link>
		<dc:creator>H</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 23:50:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-9100</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s correct.  The statute is unambiguous.  

If applicant retained entire interest --&gt; he signs.
If applicant assign a partial interest --&gt; partial assignees AND applicant signs.
If applicant assigns entire interest --&gt; assignee signs.
OR attorney/agent OF RECORD can always sign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s correct.  The statute is unambiguous.  </p>
<p>If applicant retained entire interest &#8211;&gt; he signs.<br />
If applicant assign a partial interest &#8211;&gt; partial assignees AND applicant signs.<br />
If applicant assigns entire interest &#8211;&gt; assignee signs.<br />
OR attorney/agent OF RECORD can always sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LM</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-8684</link>
		<dc:creator>LM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 01:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-8684</guid>
		<description>Undivided part interest and divided part interest - in terms of real property law =

divided part interest is like partnership = each one has distinct share and upon death of one person/party it is inheriated by heirs of that personor as agreed between the partners

Undivided part interes is like joint tenancy = each one owns whole part.  Ex. house in the name of husband and wife.  They both owns house - it is undivided interest.  One can not sell it without other person consent.  There is no distinct share in the property unless divided by partition or something.  And in the event of death, other joint owner owns entirely.  No legal heirs of deceased owner owns by will or otherwise unless agreed between the parties otherwise.

LM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Undivided part interest and divided part interest &#8211; in terms of real property law =</p>
<p>divided part interest is like partnership = each one has distinct share and upon death of one person/party it is inheriated by heirs of that personor as agreed between the partners</p>
<p>Undivided part interes is like joint tenancy = each one owns whole part.  Ex. house in the name of husband and wife.  They both owns house &#8211; it is undivided interest.  One can not sell it without other person consent.  There is no distinct share in the property unless divided by partition or something.  And in the event of death, other joint owner owns entirely.  No legal heirs of deceased owner owns by will or otherwise unless agreed between the parties otherwise.</p>
<p>LM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patenttips</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-8674</link>
		<dc:creator>patenttips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-8674</guid>
		<description>Good explanation.  Have to think of patents as property.

I think everyone needs to sign in order to do something that affects the patent and since inventor assigned patent over to someone else, they aren&#039;t the only owner, so seems like inventor can&#039;t do it by themselves and everyone basically needs to get involved.  Must cause fights!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good explanation.  Have to think of patents as property.</p>
<p>I think everyone needs to sign in order to do something that affects the patent and since inventor assigned patent over to someone else, they aren&#8217;t the only owner, so seems like inventor can&#8217;t do it by themselves and everyone basically needs to get involved.  Must cause fights!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: patenttips</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-8673</link>
		<dc:creator>patenttips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/413/#comment-8673</guid>
		<description>Statutory means you can&#039;t get over it.

If the claims are the same invention, you can&#039;t get two patents to one invention, hence statutory.

Non-statutory means you can basically file a terminal disclaimer to get over it.  Usually obviousness rejections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Statutory means you can&#8217;t get over it.</p>
<p>If the claims are the same invention, you can&#8217;t get two patents to one invention, hence statutory.</p>
<p>Non-statutory means you can basically file a terminal disclaimer to get over it.  Usually obviousness rejections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

