<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q) Advisory Action</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/409/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/409/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 00:33:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zariel</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/409/#comment-24913</link>
		<dc:creator>Zariel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 04:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=409#comment-24913</guid>
		<description>Is that really all there is to it because that&#039;d be fbalbergasting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is that really all there is to it because that&#8217;d be fbalbergasting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/409/#comment-22337</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 22:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=409#comment-22337</guid>
		<description>Basically you need to know two points about an Advisory Action: 
(A) It does not toll the time against the 6 month rule after a Final rejection (.       (B) But in the,  2 month rule/ After final rejection it is a response that will toll time to the next &quot;time extension&quot; payment (if the AA is submitted after the set 3 months response time).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Basically you need to know two points about an Advisory Action:<br />
(A) It does not toll the time against the 6 month rule after a Final rejection (.       (B) But in the,  2 month rule/ After final rejection it is a response that will toll time to the next &#8220;time extension&#8221; payment (if the AA is submitted after the set 3 months response time).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overworkked</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/409/#comment-10108</link>
		<dc:creator>Overworkked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=409#comment-10108</guid>
		<description>Variant on 4/27/2011 E8R8</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Variant on 4/27/2011 E8R8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darkfire</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/409/#comment-2335</link>
		<dc:creator>darkfire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 00:51:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=409#comment-2335</guid>
		<description>MPEP 2265: I.FINAL ACTION — TIME FOR RESPONSE
Normally, examiners will complete a response to an amendment after final rejection within 5 days after receipt thereof. In those situations where the advisory action cannot be mailed in sufficient time for the patent owner to consider the examiner’s position with respect to the amendment after final rejection (or other patent owner paper) and act on it before termination of the prosecution of the proceeding, the granting of additional time to complete the response to the final rejection or to take other appropriate action would be appropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MPEP 2265: I.FINAL ACTION — TIME FOR RESPONSE<br />
Normally, examiners will complete a response to an amendment after final rejection within 5 days after receipt thereof. In those situations where the advisory action cannot be mailed in sufficient time for the patent owner to consider the examiner’s position with respect to the amendment after final rejection (or other patent owner paper) and act on it before termination of the prosecution of the proceeding, the granting of additional time to complete the response to the final rejection or to take other appropriate action would be appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sethz</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/409/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>sethz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 02:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=409#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>2 month rule, 710.02(e)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>2 month rule, 710.02(e)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidtle</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2008/08/01/409/#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator>davidtle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 21:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/?p=409#comment-1275</guid>
		<description>The Period for reply expires on :
(1) the mailing date of this Advisory Action, or
(2) the date set forth in the final rejection, whichever is later.  In no event, however, will the stautory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of the final rejection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Period for reply expires on :<br />
(1) the mailing date of this Advisory Action, or<br />
(2) the date set forth in the final rejection, whichever is later.  In no event, however, will the stautory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of the final rejection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

