<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q) Small Entity Status (MPEP 500, Multiple Questions)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: fengyuwuzu</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-17013</link>
		<dc:creator>fengyuwuzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 19:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-17013</guid>
		<description>what about the Small Entity Status was established in the beginning but &quot;by mistake&quot; large entity fee was paid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what about the Small Entity Status was established in the beginning but &#8220;by mistake&#8221; large entity fee was paid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIA</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-16344</link>
		<dc:creator>MIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2011 05:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-16344</guid>
		<description>I cannot find anywhere where it says that an assignee of record who acts in a REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY can sign AND file on behalf of the inventer??  Unless the word &quot;resort&quot; under 1.27(c)(2)(iii) can be interpreted as acting in a rep cap way..

§ 1.27
(c)Assertion of small entity status.
(2)Parties who can sign and file the written assertion. The written assertion can be signed by:
(iii)An assignee of an undivided part interest, notwithstanding §§ 1.33(b)(3) and 3.73(b) of this chapter, but the partial assignee cannot file the assertion without resort to a party identified under § 1.33(b) of this part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot find anywhere where it says that an assignee of record who acts in a REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY can sign AND file on behalf of the inventer??  Unless the word &#8220;resort&#8221; under 1.27(c)(2)(iii) can be interpreted as acting in a rep cap way..</p>
<p>§ 1.27<br />
(c)Assertion of small entity status.<br />
(2)Parties who can sign and file the written assertion. The written assertion can be signed by:<br />
(iii)An assignee of an undivided part interest, notwithstanding §§ 1.33(b)(3) and 3.73(b) of this chapter, but the partial assignee cannot file the assertion without resort to a party identified under § 1.33(b) of this part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-15852</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-15852</guid>
		<description>Here is the source for the fact that the partial assignee not of record can sign. In 1.27(2)(i) it says that parties of 1.33(b) can sign. There, it addresses an assignee not of record who acts in a REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY can sign AND file on behalf of the inventor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the source for the fact that the partial assignee not of record can sign. In 1.27(2)(i) it says that parties of 1.33(b) can sign. There, it addresses an assignee not of record who acts in a REPRESENTATIVE CAPACITY can sign AND file on behalf of the inventor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-15851</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-15851</guid>
		<description>Where in the MPEP does it state that the partial assignee not of record can sign? i did not see this mentioned in §405.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where in the MPEP does it state that the partial assignee not of record can sign? i did not see this mentioned in §405.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-15765</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 07:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-15765</guid>
		<description>I think partial assignee can sign, they just can&#039;t file...

MPEP 509.03
III.PARTIES WHO CAN FILE THE WRITTEN ASSERTION ONCE SIGNED
A distinction exists as to who can file a written assertion of entitlement to small entity status once the written assertion is signed. 37 CFR 1.27(c)(2)(ii) and 37 CFR 1.33(b) permit one of several inventors to file as well as to sign a written assertion. The same is not true for a partial assignee. 37 CFR 1.27(c)(2)(iii). While a partial assignee may sign a written assertion, the written assertion must be filed by an appropriate party under 37 CFR 1.33(b).

Please correct me if I am wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think partial assignee can sign, they just can&#8217;t file&#8230;</p>
<p>MPEP 509.03<br />
III.PARTIES WHO CAN FILE THE WRITTEN ASSERTION ONCE SIGNED<br />
A distinction exists as to who can file a written assertion of entitlement to small entity status once the written assertion is signed. 37 CFR 1.27(c)(2)(ii) and 37 CFR 1.33(b) permit one of several inventors to file as well as to sign a written assertion. The same is not true for a partial assignee. 37 CFR 1.27(c)(2)(iii). While a partial assignee may sign a written assertion, the written assertion must be filed by an appropriate party under 37 CFR 1.33(b).</p>
<p>Please correct me if I am wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-13984</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-13984</guid>
		<description>Got the one where the answer is D) GOVERNMENT and one that was phrased who CANNOT sign --&gt; Partial Assignee on 7/29/2011</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got the one where the answer is D) GOVERNMENT and one that was phrased who CANNOT sign &#8211;&gt; Partial Assignee on 7/29/2011</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigbadvoododaddy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-13091</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigbadvoododaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 01:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-13091</guid>
		<description>That should be partial assignee not of record - can sign, but not file.
Since an assignee of the entire interest may sign - it is one of those listed where ownership need not be established, 324.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That should be partial assignee not of record &#8211; can sign, but not file.<br />
Since an assignee of the entire interest may sign &#8211; it is one of those listed where ownership need not be established, 324.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigbadvoododaddy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-13090</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigbadvoododaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 01:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-13090</guid>
		<description>the above identified small business concern [i.e., IBI] qualifies as a small business concern as defined in 13 CFR 121.3-18, and reproduced in 37 CFR 1.9(d), for purposes of paying reduced fees under section 41(a) and (b) of Title 35, United States Code, in that the number of employees of the concern, including those of its affiliates, does not exceed 500 persons. For purposes of this statement, (1) the number of employees of the business concern is the average over the previous fiscal year of the concern of the persons employed on a full-time, part-time or temporary basis during each of the pay periods of the fiscal year, and (2) concerns are affiliates of each other when either, directly or indirectly, one concern controls or has the power to control the other, or a third party or parties controls or has the power to control both.

So I stand corrected. Both D and E are incorrect for Q 1

Everyone scratch your heads :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the above identified small business concern [i.e., IBI] qualifies as a small business concern as defined in 13 CFR 121.3-18, and reproduced in 37 CFR 1.9(d), for purposes of paying reduced fees under section 41(a) and (b) of Title 35, United States Code, in that the number of employees of the concern, including those of its affiliates, does not exceed 500 persons. For purposes of this statement, (1) the number of employees of the business concern is the average over the previous fiscal year of the concern of the persons employed on a full-time, part-time or temporary basis during each of the pay periods of the fiscal year, and (2) concerns are affiliates of each other when either, directly or indirectly, one concern controls or has the power to control the other, or a third party or parties controls or has the power to control both.</p>
<p>So I stand corrected. Both D and E are incorrect for Q 1</p>
<p>Everyone scratch your heads <img src='http://mypatentbar.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigbadvoododaddy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-13089</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigbadvoododaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 01:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-13089</guid>
		<description>This is a good and correct explanation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good and correct explanation</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigbadvoododaddy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-13088</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigbadvoododaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 01:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/17/q34-small-entity-status-mpep/#comment-13088</guid>
		<description>INCORRECT: A partial assignee can sign it but not file the statement with the PTO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INCORRECT: A partial assignee can sign it but not file the statement with the PTO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

