<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Examination of Applications (MPEP 700)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/05/examination-of-applications-mpep-700/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/05/examination-of-applications-mpep-700/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:34:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KW</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/05/examination-of-applications-mpep-700/#comment-2307</link>
		<dc:creator>KW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 05:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/05/examination-of-applications-mpep-700/#comment-2307</guid>
		<description>I noticed this discrepancy as well. In the April 2003 exam, the answer to this question was that it would require a fee because the CFR (1.102(c)...http://mpep.patentbargroup.com/pdf/mpep_e8r2_appxr_508.pdf) at that time did not list &quot;countering terrorism&quot; as an exception. The current version does not require a fee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I noticed this discrepancy as well. In the April 2003 exam, the answer to this question was that it would require a fee because the CFR (1.102(c)&#8230;http://mpep.patentbargroup.com/pdf/mpep_e8r2_appxr_508.pdf) at that time did not list &#8220;countering terrorism&#8221; as an exception. The current version does not require a fee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JP</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/05/examination-of-applications-mpep-700/#comment-1207</link>
		<dc:creator>JP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 08:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/05/examination-of-applications-mpep-700/#comment-1207</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing this great outline with everyone!

Re: section on revivals and terminal disclaimers. A part of the section may be misleading or incorrect if I understand the revival requirements in 37 CFR 1.137(d). I think both the terminal disclaimer and accompanying fee apply only if it’s a design patent OR other patent app filed before 19950608.

According to the outline:
Under 37 CFR 1.137(d) the petition needs to have a terminal disclaimer (remember a terminal disclaimer will shorten the life of the patent from the normal 20 years from filing time).
o	This disclaimer fee only applies to design patents OR other patent apps that were filed before June 8, 1995 (modern apps do not need the disclaimer fee anymore)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing this great outline with everyone!</p>
<p>Re: section on revivals and terminal disclaimers. A part of the section may be misleading or incorrect if I understand the revival requirements in 37 CFR 1.137(d). I think both the terminal disclaimer and accompanying fee apply only if it’s a design patent OR other patent app filed before 19950608.</p>
<p>According to the outline:<br />
Under 37 CFR 1.137(d) the petition needs to have a terminal disclaimer (remember a terminal disclaimer will shorten the life of the patent from the normal 20 years from filing time).<br />
o	This disclaimer fee only applies to design patents OR other patent apps that were filed before June 8, 1995 (modern apps do not need the disclaimer fee anymore)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DY</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/05/examination-of-applications-mpep-700/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator>DY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/12/05/examination-of-applications-mpep-700/#comment-1206</guid>
		<description>Re: as per inventions aiding in the countering of terrorism requiring a fee to make special: as per MPEP 708.02, I don&#039;t think this is the case (they don&#039;t seem to require a fee):

(c) A petition to make an application special may be filed without a fee if the basis for the petition is:
  (1) The applicant’s age or health; or
  (2) That the invention will materially:
    (i)   Enhance the quality of the environment;
    (ii)  Contribute to the development or conservation of energy
         resources; or
    (iii) Contribute to countering terrorism.&lt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: as per inventions aiding in the countering of terrorism requiring a fee to make special: as per MPEP 708.02, I don&#8217;t think this is the case (they don&#8217;t seem to require a fee):</p>
<p>(c) A petition to make an application special may be filed without a fee if the basis for the petition is:<br />
  (1) The applicant’s age or health; or<br />
  (2) That the invention will materially:<br />
    (i)   Enhance the quality of the environment;<br />
    (ii)  Contribute to the development or conservation of energy<br />
         resources; or<br />
    (iii) Contribute to countering terrorism.&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
