<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 35 USC 102(g)&quot;Prior Invention&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102f-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102f-2/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 22:04:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SE</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102f-2/#comment-34952</link>
		<dc:creator>SE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 18:40:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102f-2/#comment-34952</guid>
		<description>There is a mistake: 
Rule 131 CANNOT be used to swear behind 102g prior art. It can only be used to overcome 102a and 102e.

However, when the subject matter relied on is also available under 35 U.S.C. 102(g), a 37 CFR 1.131 affidavit or declaration cannot be used to overcome it. In re Bass, 474 F.2d 1276, 177 USPQ 178 (CCPA 1973). This is because subject matter which is available under 35 U.S.C. 102(g) by definition must have been made before the applicant made his or her invention. By contrast, references under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and (e), for example, merely establish a presumption that their subject matter was made before applicant&#039;s invention date. It is this presumption which may be rebutted by evidence submitted under 37 CFR 1.131.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a mistake:<br />
Rule 131 CANNOT be used to swear behind 102g prior art. It can only be used to overcome 102a and 102e.</p>
<p>However, when the subject matter relied on is also available under 35 U.S.C. 102(g), a 37 CFR 1.131 affidavit or declaration cannot be used to overcome it. In re Bass, 474 F.2d 1276, 177 USPQ 178 (CCPA 1973). This is because subject matter which is available under 35 U.S.C. 102(g) by definition must have been made before the applicant made his or her invention. By contrast, references under 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and (e), for example, merely establish a presumption that their subject matter was made before applicant&#8217;s invention date. It is this presumption which may be rebutted by evidence submitted under 37 CFR 1.131.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LM</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102f-2/#comment-8723</link>
		<dc:creator>LM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2011 07:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102f-2/#comment-8723</guid>
		<description>key to remember:

102 (g)

&#039;g&#039; for GONE from your hand - if other invented before U

= competition between YOU and ANOTHER

= who invented first</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>key to remember:</p>
<p>102 (g)</p>
<p>&#8216;g&#8217; for GONE from your hand &#8211; if other invented before U</p>
<p>= competition between YOU and ANOTHER</p>
<p>= who invented first</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

