<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 35 USC 102(c) &quot;Abandonment&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102c/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102c/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 22:04:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aug25/2008</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102c/#comment-1163</link>
		<dc:creator>Aug25/2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102c/#comment-1163</guid>
		<description>correction: abandonment of invention is 102(c).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>correction: abandonment of invention is 102(c).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vman</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102c/#comment-1162</link>
		<dc:creator>vman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102c/#comment-1162</guid>
		<description>File another case with the identical matter ...

Hmm, so if I&#039;m an inventor and I have published an article which disparages the concept which the invention is based on. How would this publication not affect the new application I submit?


I assume no 102 a,b issues ofcourse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>File another case with the identical matter &#8230;</p>
<p>Hmm, so if I&#8217;m an inventor and I have published an article which disparages the concept which the invention is based on. How would this publication not affect the new application I submit?</p>
<p>I assume no 102 a,b issues ofcourse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nik</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102c/#comment-1161</link>
		<dc:creator>Nik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 21:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102c/#comment-1161</guid>
		<description>Note: abandonment under 103(c) is abandonment of the invention, NOT a patent application.  An inventor can abandon an application, and so long as no prior art issues arise, file another application drawn to identical subject matter, provided there is not proof of the inventor&#039;s intent to dedicate his inventiuon to the publication</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note: abandonment under 103(c) is abandonment of the invention, NOT a patent application.  An inventor can abandon an application, and so long as no prior art issues arise, file another application drawn to identical subject matter, provided there is not proof of the inventor&#8217;s intent to dedicate his inventiuon to the publication</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

