<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 35 USC 102(a)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102a/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102a/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:34:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marc Avila</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102a/#comment-2312</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Avila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 16:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102a/#comment-2312</guid>
		<description>By &quot;Rule 31&quot; in the &quot;Overcoming a 102(a) Rejection&quot;  section, do you mean Rule § 1.131 Affidavit or declaration of prior invention?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By &#8220;Rule 31&#8243; in the &#8220;Overcoming a 102(a) Rejection&#8221;  section, do you mean Rule § 1.131 Affidavit or declaration of prior invention?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrKye</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102a/#comment-1155</link>
		<dc:creator>DrKye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 05:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102a/#comment-1155</guid>
		<description>Yes, you are correct. However, if you are planning to seek protection of your invention outside of the US, this is not the best plan of action since most countries have an absolute novelty requirement when filing for a patent. Thus, if your invention has been publicly disclosed in the US, you have forfeited your right to a patent in most other countries (except Australia and, I believe, Canada).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, you are correct. However, if you are planning to seek protection of your invention outside of the US, this is not the best plan of action since most countries have an absolute novelty requirement when filing for a patent. Thus, if your invention has been publicly disclosed in the US, you have forfeited your right to a patent in most other countries (except Australia and, I believe, Canada).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 102(a)</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102a/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>102(a)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mypatentbar.com/2007/11/27/35-usc-102a/#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>I presume that it is not barred under 102(a) for an inventor to publish his invention before the filing date of the patent application.

The statute says invention must not patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, BEFORE the invention thereof by the applicant for patent. So if the applicant describes his invention AFTER the invention thereof, it would be all right. Right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I presume that it is not barred under 102(a) for an inventor to publish his invention before the filing date of the patent application.</p>
<p>The statute says invention must not patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, BEFORE the invention thereof by the applicant for patent. So if the applicant describes his invention AFTER the invention thereof, it would be all right. Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
