Comments on: Q) Broom Handle (MPEP 2100) http://mypatentbar.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/ Patent Bar Review and Study Guide Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:15:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Jamecam http://mypatentbar.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-19412 Jamecam Mon, 31 Oct 2011 02:44:24 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-19412 I got this question on 10/29/2011. The correct answer was that the examiner should call the practitioner by phone and ask him to select a few claims for prosecution. Then, in the first office action, the examiner should make the multiplicity rejection for the unelected claims if the practitioner agrees that claims are multiplicative. I got this question on 10/29/2011.

The correct answer was that the examiner should call the practitioner by phone and ask him to select a few claims for prosecution. Then, in the first office action, the examiner should make the multiplicity rejection for the unelected claims if the practitioner agrees that claims are multiplicative.

]]> By: Remanded http://mypatentbar.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-16034 Remanded Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:54:59 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-16034 Got this one today, 18 September 2011. Got this one today, 18 September 2011.

]]> By: Nick http://mypatentbar.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-15454 Nick Wed, 07 Sep 2011 21:00:32 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-15454 Got this on 9/7/11. Got this on 9/7/11.

]]> By: ntl http://mypatentbar.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-15424 ntl Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:46:08 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-15424 Got this one on 09/06/11. Got this one on 09/06/11.

]]> By: TJL http://mypatentbar.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-14613 TJL Fri, 19 Aug 2011 03:42:48 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-14613 Got this 8/18. Got this 8/18.

]]> By: Daniel http://mypatentbar.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-13986 Daniel Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:11:28 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-13986 Saw this one exactly on 7/29/2011 Saw this one exactly on 7/29/2011

]]> By: Bob http://mypatentbar.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-13944 Bob Wed, 03 Aug 2011 06:02:36 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-13944 Got this on 8/2/11 Got this on 8/2/11

]]> By: giaps2 http://mypatentbar.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-13685 giaps2 Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:08:32 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-13685 Saw this question or a variant on 07/25/11. Saw this question or a variant on 07/25/11.

]]> By: Sarah http://mypatentbar.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-10985 Sarah Wed, 18 May 2011 20:07:33 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-10985 Got this question today 5/18/11. Got this question today 5/18/11.

]]> By: Becker http://mypatentbar.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-10878 Becker Tue, 17 May 2011 19:15:49 +0000 http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/27/question-2081-broom-handle/#comment-10878 I got this question 5/16/2011. I got this question 5/16/2011.

]]>