<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q) Costa Rica and Sweeden &#8211; PCT (1800)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 22:04:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keener</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-42597</link>
		<dc:creator>Keener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 19:45:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-42597</guid>
		<description>Thanks Ghost...We need more posts like yours.  Too bad we can&#039;t flag outdated or erroneous posts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Ghost&#8230;We need more posts like yours.  Too bad we can&#8217;t flag outdated or erroneous posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick K</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-39408</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 15:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-39408</guid>
		<description>Got Costa Rica today. 4/24/2012

Three inventors, I chose forward to IB and keep filing date</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got Costa Rica today. 4/24/2012</p>
<p>Three inventors, I chose forward to IB and keep filing date</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GDB</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-38933</link>
		<dc:creator>GDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 04:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-38933</guid>
		<description>Also got the Japan one that David quoted above in post #51. I also said E was the answer. 
04/19/12</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also got the Japan one that David quoted above in post #51. I also said E was the answer.<br />
04/19/12</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GDB</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-38885</link>
		<dc:creator>GDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 22:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-38885</guid>
		<description>Got Sweden on 19/04/12</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got Sweden on 19/04/12</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGhostOfBilski</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-37631</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGhostOfBilski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2012 19:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-37631</guid>
		<description>Just noting for those of you reading through - Q14A above is lacking two answer choices.  Read next post from Maggie for add&#039;l choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just noting for those of you reading through &#8211; Q14A above is lacking two answer choices.  Read next post from Maggie for add&#8217;l choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kerstin</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-35181</link>
		<dc:creator>Kerstin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2012 21:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-35181</guid>
		<description>I believe E is right above-it was my understanding that if the US receives an IA that is not in English and doesn&#039;t designate US, it is unequipped to handle it, thus it will automatically forward on to IB to deal with language barrier issue. Sorry I don&#039;t have a reference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe E is right above-it was my understanding that if the US receives an IA that is not in English and doesn&#8217;t designate US, it is unequipped to handle it, thus it will automatically forward on to IB to deal with language barrier issue. Sorry I don&#8217;t have a reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-31437</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 06:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-31437</guid>
		<description>Saw Sweden Q on 2/10/2012. 
Just remember that app will receive filing date and that USPTO will forward the app to IB.

Another variation where in 2002, Japanese resident/national file PCT app in Japaneses at USPTO, designating ONLY Japan. What should USPTO do?
A) invite to submit English translation
B) invite to submit English translation w/ surcharge fee
C) give filing date once English translation is submitted
D) forward it to Japanese RO and not give a filing date
E) transmit it to IB once transmit fee is submitted

I believe E is the correct answer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw Sweden Q on 2/10/2012.<br />
Just remember that app will receive filing date and that USPTO will forward the app to IB.</p>
<p>Another variation where in 2002, Japanese resident/national file PCT app in Japaneses at USPTO, designating ONLY Japan. What should USPTO do?<br />
A) invite to submit English translation<br />
B) invite to submit English translation w/ surcharge fee<br />
C) give filing date once English translation is submitted<br />
D) forward it to Japanese RO and not give a filing date<br />
E) transmit it to IB once transmit fee is submitted</p>
<p>I believe E is the correct answer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomodachi</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-17648</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomodachi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2011 05:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-17648</guid>
		<description>Thanks maggie!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks maggie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIA</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-16071</link>
		<dc:creator>MIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-16071</guid>
		<description>Thank you maggie for that posting!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you maggie for that posting!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-15792</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/question-2011-pct-and-102e-dates/#comment-15792</guid>
		<description>Q14A) Costa Rica + Sweden variants
All three  inventors from Sweden file a IA in a USRO on Jan 4, 2004 (*Non Us residents) with English translation and necessary documents. Q Is the USRO competent? Q What will they do with the application?
1)	wont get a filing date b/c US/RO is not competent (due to applicant lack of citizenship) and they wont get a filing date. 
2)	although the US/RO may be incompetent, they will forward to US/RO. 
(3)  App will be forwarded to IB/RO and given date which it was received at US/RO.

Answer (3) checked at PTO VA --will be forwarded to IB/RO and given date which it was received at US/RO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q14A) Costa Rica + Sweden variants<br />
All three  inventors from Sweden file a IA in a USRO on Jan 4, 2004 (*Non Us residents) with English translation and necessary documents. Q Is the USRO competent? Q What will they do with the application?<br />
1)	wont get a filing date b/c US/RO is not competent (due to applicant lack of citizenship) and they wont get a filing date.<br />
2)	although the US/RO may be incompetent, they will forward to US/RO.<br />
(3)  App will be forwarded to IB/RO and given date which it was received at US/RO.</p>
<p>Answer (3) checked at PTO VA &#8211;will be forwarded to IB/RO and given date which it was received at US/RO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

