<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q) PCT Publication (which old test is this from?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-16978</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 08:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-16978</guid>
		<description>Saw this one on 10/3.

Answer included something along the lines of: &quot;IB will not publish, but US will publish upon entry into the national stage&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw this one on 10/3.</p>
<p>Answer included something along the lines of: &#8220;IB will not publish, but US will publish upon entry into the national stage&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BPY</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-15017</link>
		<dc:creator>BPY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-15017</guid>
		<description>Should not it be 30 months after the priority date (may or may not be the filing date depending on whether priority is claimed)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should not it be 30 months after the priority date (may or may not be the filing date depending on whether priority is claimed)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigbadvoododaddy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-12796</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigbadvoododaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 03:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-12796</guid>
		<description>CORRECTION:
I&#039;ve looked it up and C is false.
Every PCT application after it enters the national stage is once again published as a US application.
Sorry for any confusion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CORRECTION:<br />
I&#8217;ve looked it up and C is false.<br />
Every PCT application after it enters the national stage is once again published as a US application.<br />
Sorry for any confusion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigbadvoododaddy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-12791</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigbadvoododaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 23:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-12791</guid>
		<description>A. is correct
B. Is false - if they desinate only the US, no publication
C. is correct.
D. is false - because all international applications are published.
E. is false
This seems to be a beta or incorrect question.
I cant find any reference which disputes statement C. See 1893.03(e)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A. is correct<br />
B. Is false &#8211; if they desinate only the US, no publication<br />
C. is correct.<br />
D. is false &#8211; because all international applications are published.<br />
E. is false<br />
This seems to be a beta or incorrect question.<br />
I cant find any reference which disputes statement C. See 1893.03(e)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: little yellow duck</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-12046</link>
		<dc:creator>little yellow duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-12046</guid>
		<description>When goes to national stage

A US PCT filed on July 23, When will be the latest date goes to national stage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When goes to national stage</p>
<p>A US PCT filed on July 23, When will be the latest date goes to national stage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent JD</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-12033</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 02:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-12033</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth:  these search hints still hold for E8R8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth:  these search hints still hold for E8R8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calvin</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-1537</link>
		<dc:creator>calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-1537</guid>
		<description>Searching &quot;18 months&quot; from top of 1800 PCT finds 1803 on the third hit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Searching &#8220;18 months&#8221; from top of 1800 PCT finds 1803 on the third hit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chemist62</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Chemist62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>This is how you may find it:

In the MPEP E8R4 go into Appendix T: PCT.  Search for &quot;not published&quot;.  After one ot two clicks you see the reference to Article 64(3), the title of the Article is Reservations.

In the MPEP E8R4 do into Chapter 1800, PCT, search for 64(3) or Reservation, It will take you pretty quickly to 1803.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is how you may find it:</p>
<p>In the MPEP E8R4 go into Appendix T: PCT.  Search for &#8220;not published&#8221;.  After one ot two clicks you see the reference to Article 64(3), the title of the Article is Reservations.</p>
<p>In the MPEP E8R4 do into Chapter 1800, PCT, search for 64(3) or Reservation, It will take you pretty quickly to 1803.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Art Williams</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Art Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2009 21:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-126</guid>
		<description>With regard to the test question involving publication of international applications received by the USPTO as receiving office, can anyone tell me how one might find MPEP 1803 by searching.  I am quite impressed by Dan&#039;s post #38 on the &quot;Prometric Patent Bar&quot; tab which the advocates the extensive use MPEP search, but I don&#039;t see how to apply Dan&#039;s test-taking strategy to a case like this one.  I have yet to find a keyword or key phrase that leads to 1803.

Thanks, Art Williams</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regard to the test question involving publication of international applications received by the USPTO as receiving office, can anyone tell me how one might find MPEP 1803 by searching.  I am quite impressed by Dan&#8217;s post #38 on the &#8220;Prometric Patent Bar&#8221; tab which the advocates the extensive use MPEP search, but I don&#8217;t see how to apply Dan&#8217;s test-taking strategy to a case like this one.  I have yet to find a keyword or key phrase that leads to 1803.</p>
<p>Thanks, Art Williams</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CW</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>CW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-125</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s not the same question. It wanted to know if it would be published as an IA and/or under 122. The choices were it would be published once, under each, not at all, etc.

The correct answer is that it would not be published as an IA, since the US was the only designated state, but it would be published when it entered the national stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s not the same question. It wanted to know if it would be published as an IA and/or under 122. The choices were it would be published once, under each, not at all, etc.</p>
<p>The correct answer is that it would not be published as an IA, since the US was the only designated state, but it would be published when it entered the national stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

