<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q) PCT Publication (which old test is this from?)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 21:57:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Keener</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-42744</link>
		<dc:creator>Keener</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 21:57:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-42744</guid>
		<description>I thought PCT had to publish at 18 months.  I can&#039;t find where it says otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought PCT had to publish at 18 months.  I can&#8217;t find where it says otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GDB</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-38912</link>
		<dc:creator>GDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2012 03:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-38912</guid>
		<description>I had one similar on 04/19/12. 

PCT filed in US receiving office. Applicant only designated US and didn&#039;t request publication. Question asked whether the patent would be published by the IB or ISA or USPTO with a few variations. 

Answer that I chose after looking at MPEP: PCT will not be published by IB or ISA but will be published by USPTO when it goes to national stage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had one similar on 04/19/12. </p>
<p>PCT filed in US receiving office. Applicant only designated US and didn&#8217;t request publication. Question asked whether the patent would be published by the IB or ISA or USPTO with a few variations. </p>
<p>Answer that I chose after looking at MPEP: PCT will not be published by IB or ISA but will be published by USPTO when it goes to national stage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-16978</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 08:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-16978</guid>
		<description>Saw this one on 10/3.

Answer included something along the lines of: &quot;IB will not publish, but US will publish upon entry into the national stage&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw this one on 10/3.</p>
<p>Answer included something along the lines of: &#8220;IB will not publish, but US will publish upon entry into the national stage&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BPY</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-15017</link>
		<dc:creator>BPY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 13:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-15017</guid>
		<description>Should not it be 30 months after the priority date (may or may not be the filing date depending on whether priority is claimed)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should not it be 30 months after the priority date (may or may not be the filing date depending on whether priority is claimed)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigbadvoododaddy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-12796</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigbadvoododaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 03:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-12796</guid>
		<description>CORRECTION:
I&#039;ve looked it up and C is false.
Every PCT application after it enters the national stage is once again published as a US application.
Sorry for any confusion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CORRECTION:<br />
I&#8217;ve looked it up and C is false.<br />
Every PCT application after it enters the national stage is once again published as a US application.<br />
Sorry for any confusion</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigbadvoododaddy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-12791</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigbadvoododaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 23:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-12791</guid>
		<description>A. is correct
B. Is false - if they desinate only the US, no publication
C. is correct.
D. is false - because all international applications are published.
E. is false
This seems to be a beta or incorrect question.
I cant find any reference which disputes statement C. See 1893.03(e)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A. is correct<br />
B. Is false &#8211; if they desinate only the US, no publication<br />
C. is correct.<br />
D. is false &#8211; because all international applications are published.<br />
E. is false<br />
This seems to be a beta or incorrect question.<br />
I cant find any reference which disputes statement C. See 1893.03(e)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: little yellow duck</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-12046</link>
		<dc:creator>little yellow duck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 13:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-12046</guid>
		<description>When goes to national stage

A US PCT filed on July 23, When will be the latest date goes to national stage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When goes to national stage</p>
<p>A US PCT filed on July 23, When will be the latest date goes to national stage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Recent JD</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-12033</link>
		<dc:creator>Recent JD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jun 2011 02:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-12033</guid>
		<description>For what it&#039;s worth:  these search hints still hold for E8R8.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth:  these search hints still hold for E8R8.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calvin</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-1537</link>
		<dc:creator>calvin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:06:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-1537</guid>
		<description>Searching &quot;18 months&quot; from top of 1800 PCT finds 1803 on the third hit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Searching &#8220;18 months&#8221; from top of 1800 PCT finds 1803 on the third hit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chemist62</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Chemist62</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/18/q18-pct-bypass-method/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>This is how you may find it:

In the MPEP E8R4 go into Appendix T: PCT.  Search for &quot;not published&quot;.  After one ot two clicks you see the reference to Article 64(3), the title of the Article is Reservations.

In the MPEP E8R4 do into Chapter 1800, PCT, search for 64(3) or Reservation, It will take you pretty quickly to 1803.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is how you may find it:</p>
<p>In the MPEP E8R4 go into Appendix T: PCT.  Search for &#8220;not published&#8221;.  After one ot two clicks you see the reference to Article 64(3), the title of the Article is Reservations.</p>
<p>In the MPEP E8R4 do into Chapter 1800, PCT, search for 64(3) or Reservation, It will take you pretty quickly to 1803.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

