<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q) Best Mode</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 21:57:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: GDB</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-38891</link>
		<dc:creator>GDB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2012 23:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-38891</guid>
		<description>Got a best mode question 04/19/12</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got a best mode question 04/19/12</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sol</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-38068</link>
		<dc:creator>Sol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 18:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-38068</guid>
		<description>Best mode
Who decides it is the Best mode? The inventor. Not anyone else or posista. It is subjective. As long as the inventor disclose the best mode he things, then it is OK. And the inventor does not need to point out which is the best mode as long as the best mode in his mind is included in the application. AND it is at the time of filing

Inventor has disclosed A, B, C modes and did NOT disclose X mode
Others, at the time of filing, made E, F modes
If A is the best mode in the inventor&#039;s mind, It is not desginated  is the best mode, OK
If the inventor cannot tell wich one is the best, but sure X is not the best mode, OK
If the inventor consier X the best mode, TROUBLE

If the inventor does not know E, F, OK not to disclose
If the inventor know E, F and consier them inferior to A/B/C (regardless if it is objective correct or not), OK not to disclose
If the inventor know E and consider E is the best mode, he HAS TO disclose E even if he is not the one who discovered it.


The failure to disclose a better method will not invalidate a patent if the inventor, at the time of filing the application, did not know of the better method ORdid not appreciate that it was the best method. 

All applicants are required to disclose for the claimed subject matter the best mode contemplated by the inventor even though applicant may not have been the discoverer of that mode. Benger Labs. Ltd. v. R.K. Laros Co., 209 F. Supp. 639, 135 USPQ 11 (E.D. Pa. 1962).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best mode<br />
Who decides it is the Best mode? The inventor. Not anyone else or posista. It is subjective. As long as the inventor disclose the best mode he things, then it is OK. And the inventor does not need to point out which is the best mode as long as the best mode in his mind is included in the application. AND it is at the time of filing</p>
<p>Inventor has disclosed A, B, C modes and did NOT disclose X mode<br />
Others, at the time of filing, made E, F modes<br />
If A is the best mode in the inventor&#8217;s mind, It is not desginated  is the best mode, OK<br />
If the inventor cannot tell wich one is the best, but sure X is not the best mode, OK<br />
If the inventor consier X the best mode, TROUBLE</p>
<p>If the inventor does not know E, F, OK not to disclose<br />
If the inventor know E, F and consier them inferior to A/B/C (regardless if it is objective correct or not), OK not to disclose<br />
If the inventor know E and consider E is the best mode, he HAS TO disclose E even if he is not the one who discovered it.</p>
<p>The failure to disclose a better method will not invalidate a patent if the inventor, at the time of filing the application, did not know of the better method ORdid not appreciate that it was the best method. </p>
<p>All applicants are required to disclose for the claimed subject matter the best mode contemplated by the inventor even though applicant may not have been the discoverer of that mode. Benger Labs. Ltd. v. R.K. Laros Co., 209 F. Supp. 639, 135 USPQ 11 (E.D. Pa. 1962).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheGhostOfBilski</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-37997</link>
		<dc:creator>TheGhostOfBilski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 03:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-37997</guid>
		<description>similar Q 4/6/2012</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>similar Q 4/6/2012</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remanded</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-29520</link>
		<dc:creator>Remanded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-29520</guid>
		<description>Saw this 20 January 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw this 20 January 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-17781</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-17781</guid>
		<description>Yes, As Jeremy states (below).  Best mode does not need to be directly pointed out in application but does need to be disclosed somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, As Jeremy states (below).  Best mode does not need to be directly pointed out in application but does need to be disclosed somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgw</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-17771</link>
		<dc:creator>sgw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-17771</guid>
		<description>Got this 10/16/2011.
Applicant does not have to specify which is the best mode, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got this 10/16/2011.<br />
Applicant does not have to specify which is the best mode, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-16209</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-16209</guid>
		<description>The distinction seems to be: best mode is DISCLOSED when it is one of the one or more embodiments presented, however it need not be POINTED OUT. The requirement is that it be present (disclosed).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The distinction seems to be: best mode is DISCLOSED when it is one of the one or more embodiments presented, however it need not be POINTED OUT. The requirement is that it be present (disclosed).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-16067</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-16067</guid>
		<description>This case law is talking about a situation where the best mode has already been designated when filed, but the inventor finds a better mode later. In this instance, there is no need to disclose the better one. But, without stating the best mode at filing, the app. is incomplete and will be rejected under 112.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This case law is talking about a situation where the best mode has already been designated when filed, but the inventor finds a better mode later. In this instance, there is no need to disclose the better one. But, without stating the best mode at filing, the app. is incomplete and will be rejected under 112.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-15865</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-15865</guid>
		<description>Same question for you. Your answer seems to indicate that best mode is not required. Please reconcile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same question for you. Your answer seems to indicate that best mode is not required. Please reconcile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-15864</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-15864</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t understand this answer. You need to have a best mode under 112. Your answer seems to indicate that you don&#039;t. Please reconcile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t understand this answer. You need to have a best mode under 112. Your answer seems to indicate that you don&#8217;t. Please reconcile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

