<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q) Best Mode</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Remanded</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-29520</link>
		<dc:creator>Remanded</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-29520</guid>
		<description>Saw this 20 January 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw this 20 January 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-17781</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 21:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-17781</guid>
		<description>Yes, As Jeremy states (below).  Best mode does not need to be directly pointed out in application but does need to be disclosed somewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, As Jeremy states (below).  Best mode does not need to be directly pointed out in application but does need to be disclosed somewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sgw</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-17771</link>
		<dc:creator>sgw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Oct 2011 20:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-17771</guid>
		<description>Got this 10/16/2011.
Applicant does not have to specify which is the best mode, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got this 10/16/2011.<br />
Applicant does not have to specify which is the best mode, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-16209</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-16209</guid>
		<description>The distinction seems to be: best mode is DISCLOSED when it is one of the one or more embodiments presented, however it need not be POINTED OUT. The requirement is that it be present (disclosed).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The distinction seems to be: best mode is DISCLOSED when it is one of the one or more embodiments presented, however it need not be POINTED OUT. The requirement is that it be present (disclosed).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-16067</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 16:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-16067</guid>
		<description>This case law is talking about a situation where the best mode has already been designated when filed, but the inventor finds a better mode later. In this instance, there is no need to disclose the better one. But, without stating the best mode at filing, the app. is incomplete and will be rejected under 112.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This case law is talking about a situation where the best mode has already been designated when filed, but the inventor finds a better mode later. In this instance, there is no need to disclose the better one. But, without stating the best mode at filing, the app. is incomplete and will be rejected under 112.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-15865</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:44:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-15865</guid>
		<description>Same question for you. Your answer seems to indicate that best mode is not required. Please reconcile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same question for you. Your answer seems to indicate that best mode is not required. Please reconcile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-15864</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 21:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-15864</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t understand this answer. You need to have a best mode under 112. Your answer seems to indicate that you don&#039;t. Please reconcile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t understand this answer. You need to have a best mode under 112. Your answer seems to indicate that you don&#8217;t. Please reconcile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-14806</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 04:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-14806</guid>
		<description>Got this one 8/24 pointing out the  best embodiment is not required only disclosure is required.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got this one 8/24 pointing out the  best embodiment is not required only disclosure is required.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-13950</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 06:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-13950</guid>
		<description>Got this on 8/2/11.  Same as BigBadVoodoDaddy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got this on 8/2/11.  Same as BigBadVoodoDaddy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigBadVoodoDaddy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-13439</link>
		<dc:creator>BigBadVoodoDaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 04:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/17/q17-best-mode/#comment-13439</guid>
		<description>Had this question on jul 12th. Both the choices mentioned above show up. It is obvious the answer is something which says - you dont have to designate the best mode among all the embodiments you have listed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had this question on jul 12th. Both the choices mentioned above show up. It is obvious the answer is something which says &#8211; you dont have to designate the best mode among all the embodiments you have listed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

