<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Supplemental Oath (10.03.26a)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/16/q16-supplemental-oath/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/16/q16-supplemental-oath/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mambo5</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/16/q16-supplemental-oath/#comment-28788</link>
		<dc:creator>Mambo5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 01:11:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/q16-supplemental-oath/#comment-28788</guid>
		<description>Anon,

I think you have to consider the statement you quoted in the context of the MPEP section in which it is included.

MPEP Section 714.16 is entitled &quot;Amendment after Notice of Allowance.&quot;   That entire section you quoted is talking ONLY about the Post-Allowance timeframe.

 {{{    714.16 AMENDMENT AFTER NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE  . . .
. . .  With the exception of a supplemental oath or declaration submitted in a reissue, a supplemental oath or declaration is not treated as an amendment under 37 CFR 1.312    }}}

I have to agree with you though - the way they say it, it&#039;s not exactly straightforward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon,</p>
<p>I think you have to consider the statement you quoted in the context of the MPEP section in which it is included.</p>
<p>MPEP Section 714.16 is entitled &#8220;Amendment after Notice of Allowance.&#8221;   That entire section you quoted is talking ONLY about the Post-Allowance timeframe.</p>
<p> {{{    714.16 AMENDMENT AFTER NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE  . . .<br />
. . .  With the exception of a supplemental oath or declaration submitted in a reissue, a supplemental oath or declaration is not treated as an amendment under 37 CFR 1.312    }}}</p>
<p>I have to agree with you though &#8211; the way they say it, it&#8217;s not exactly straightforward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/16/q16-supplemental-oath/#comment-28763</link>
		<dc:creator>Anon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 21:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/q16-supplemental-oath/#comment-28763</guid>
		<description>How is B wrong?  Since MPEP § 714.16, third paragraph, states “a supplemental reissue oath or declaration is treated as an amendment under 37 CFR 1.312,&quot; wouldn&#039;t that mean that a supplemental reissue declaration filed BEFORE the notice of allowance on a reissue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is B wrong?  Since MPEP § 714.16, third paragraph, states “a supplemental reissue oath or declaration is treated as an amendment under 37 CFR 1.312,&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t that mean that a supplemental reissue declaration filed BEFORE the notice of allowance on a reissue?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/16/q16-supplemental-oath/#comment-23273</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 23:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/q16-supplemental-oath/#comment-23273</guid>
		<description>repeat 11/22/11</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>repeat 11/22/11</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/16/q16-supplemental-oath/#comment-13960</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 06:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/q16-supplemental-oath/#comment-13960</guid>
		<description>Got this on 8/2/11</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got this on 8/2/11</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Overworkked</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/16/q16-supplemental-oath/#comment-10094</link>
		<dc:creator>Overworkked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/q16-supplemental-oath/#comment-10094</guid>
		<description>VARIANT on 4/27/2011 E8R8:

Exactly as stated above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VARIANT on 4/27/2011 E8R8:</p>
<p>Exactly as stated above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/16/q16-supplemental-oath/#comment-1753</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 20:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/16/q16-supplemental-oath/#comment-1753</guid>
		<description>Here is the entire question #26
6. When, in accordance with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP, is a supplemental oath or declaration treated as an amendment under 37 CFR 1.312?


(A) When filed in a nonprovisional application after the Notice of Allowance has been mailed.

(B) When filed in a reissue application at any point during the prosecution.

(C) When filed in a nonprovisional application after the payment of the Issue Fee.

(D) When filed in a reissue application after the Notice of Allowance has been mailed.

(E) (A) and (D).

26. ANSWER: (D) is the most correct answer. MPEP § 714.16, third paragraph, states &quot;a supplemental reissue oath or declaration is treated as an amendment under 37 CFR 1.312 because the correction of the patent which it provides is an amendment of the patent, even though no amendment is physically entered into the specification or claim(s).&quot; Answer (A) is incorrect because a supplemental oath or declaration is not treated as an amendment under 37 CFR 1.312 except when submitted in a reissue. See MPEP § 603.01. Answer (B) is incorrect because a supplemental oath or declaration in a reissue will be treated as an amendment under 37 CFR § 1.312 only if filed after allowance. Answer (C) is incorrect because amendments filed after the date the issue fee has been paid are no longer permitted under 37 CFR § 1.312. (E) is wrong because (A) is correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the entire question #26<br />
6. When, in accordance with the patent laws, rules and procedures as related in the MPEP, is a supplemental oath or declaration treated as an amendment under 37 CFR 1.312?</p>
<p>(A) When filed in a nonprovisional application after the Notice of Allowance has been mailed.</p>
<p>(B) When filed in a reissue application at any point during the prosecution.</p>
<p>(C) When filed in a nonprovisional application after the payment of the Issue Fee.</p>
<p>(D) When filed in a reissue application after the Notice of Allowance has been mailed.</p>
<p>(E) (A) and (D).</p>
<p>26. ANSWER: (D) is the most correct answer. MPEP § 714.16, third paragraph, states &#8220;a supplemental reissue oath or declaration is treated as an amendment under 37 CFR 1.312 because the correction of the patent which it provides is an amendment of the patent, even though no amendment is physically entered into the specification or claim(s).&#8221; Answer (A) is incorrect because a supplemental oath or declaration is not treated as an amendment under 37 CFR 1.312 except when submitted in a reissue. See MPEP § 603.01. Answer (B) is incorrect because a supplemental oath or declaration in a reissue will be treated as an amendment under 37 CFR § 1.312 only if filed after allowance. Answer (C) is incorrect because amendments filed after the date the issue fee has been paid are no longer permitted under 37 CFR § 1.312. (E) is wrong because (A) is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

