<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q) PCT (MPEP 1800/600, Amending the Abstract)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-22312</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 20:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-22312</guid>
		<description>Reported New Abstract Q on Exam: 

What is the right of the applicant after ISA rewrites the abstract of International appl.?”
Answer agreed on: Applicant may file amendment or comments to the change within 30 days of mailing of ISA documents to the applicant, in return the ISA may or may not enter the amendment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reported New Abstract Q on Exam: </p>
<p>What is the right of the applicant after ISA rewrites the abstract of International appl.?”<br />
Answer agreed on: Applicant may file amendment or comments to the change within 30 days of mailing of ISA documents to the applicant, in return the ISA may or may not enter the amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-18024</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-18024</guid>
		<description>Sorry Appendix T is the one that is most comprehensive for PCT Rules</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry Appendix T is the one that is most comprehensive for PCT Rules</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-15750</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 04:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-15750</guid>
		<description>Google for &quot;MPEP consolidated rules&quot; you will get a PDF  doc they are in there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google for &#8220;MPEP consolidated rules&#8221; you will get a PDF  doc they are in there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-15743</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-15743</guid>
		<description>Where do i find these PCT rules? the whole 1800 talks about PCT? anyone else have suggestions on brushing up on PCT and appeals considering that ppl say these have become much more tested now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do i find these PCT rules? the whole 1800 talks about PCT? anyone else have suggestions on brushing up on PCT and appeals considering that ppl say these have become much more tested now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-14921</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-14921</guid>
		<description>Some PCT Q&#039;s I got 8/24/2011
(1) PCT Amendment Q: 3 months after Chapter I what can you modify options - Answer spec claims drawings?
(2) PCT National Stage Q:  Date to enter national stage --&gt; answer choices  20 months, 26 months, 30 months and 36 months.30 months from priority dates
(3) PCT What is need to enter National Stage at 30 months deadline--&gt; Money and Copy of Patent. 
(4) Can USPTO be the Receiving office for a PCT (corporation) was a US national/applicant. 2 Mexican inventors, 1 US national, application in Spanish lang. -answer I choose was the receiving office because it will give a fling date from USPTO then be forward to IB after for lang problem.  
(5)  PCT perfecting foreign priority with dates -- answer options choose correct date (latest 4 months from PCT filing  OR 16 months from priority filing date)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some PCT Q&#8217;s I got 8/24/2011<br />
(1) PCT Amendment Q: 3 months after Chapter I what can you modify options &#8211; Answer spec claims drawings?<br />
(2) PCT National Stage Q:  Date to enter national stage &#8211;&gt; answer choices  20 months, 26 months, 30 months and 36 months.30 months from priority dates<br />
(3) PCT What is need to enter National Stage at 30 months deadline&#8211;&gt; Money and Copy of Patent.<br />
(4) Can USPTO be the Receiving office for a PCT (corporation) was a US national/applicant. 2 Mexican inventors, 1 US national, application in Spanish lang. -answer I choose was the receiving office because it will give a fling date from USPTO then be forward to IB after for lang problem. <br />
(5)  PCT perfecting foreign priority with dates &#8212; answer options choose correct date (latest 4 months from PCT filing  OR 16 months from priority filing date)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-14920</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-14920</guid>
		<description>Great idea to read PCT RULES</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great idea to read PCT RULES</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigbadvoododaddy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-12777</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigbadvoododaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-12777</guid>
		<description>May or may not accept the modifications are found in rule 38.3 of PCT,
MPEP section 1844.01 - hence that choice is also CORRECT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>May or may not accept the modifications are found in rule 38.3 of PCT,<br />
MPEP section 1844.01 &#8211; hence that choice is also CORRECT</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bigbadvoododaddy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-12776</link>
		<dc:creator>Bigbadvoododaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jul 2011 18:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-12776</guid>
		<description>CORRECTION TO MATT30 :
The ISA indeed has the right to decide whether or not to accept the applicants modifications.

Rule 38.3, MPEP 1844.01

So I guess if you have both options as a possible answer both are CORRECT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CORRECTION TO MATT30 :<br />
The ISA indeed has the right to decide whether or not to accept the applicants modifications.</p>
<p>Rule 38.3, MPEP 1844.01</p>
<p>So I guess if you have both options as a possible answer both are CORRECT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inessa</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-8290</link>
		<dc:creator>Inessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 23:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-8290</guid>
		<description>I got this today today and chose the same answer as matt30</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got this today today and chose the same answer as matt30</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-7653</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/05/q5-amending-the-abstract/#comment-7653</guid>
		<description>Soonrealsoon,

Thank you so much for the information! This is extremely helpful since I had no idea how to study PCT before today. I will read PCT rules as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Soonrealsoon,</p>
<p>Thank you so much for the information! This is extremely helpful since I had no idea how to study PCT before today. I will read PCT rules as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

