<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q) Tribell 10.03.16a</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-20235</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-20235</guid>
		<description>Ignore my comment above...it&#039;s amazing how much I&#039;ve learned in the last two weeks! You can request a reissue at anytime after the patent issues, but you can only request a reissue to broaden claims within teh 2 year mark. But you have to specifically state that you intend to broaden in your reissue before the 2 year mark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ignore my comment above&#8230;it&#8217;s amazing how much I&#8217;ve learned in the last two weeks! You can request a reissue at anytime after the patent issues, but you can only request a reissue to broaden claims within teh 2 year mark. But you have to specifically state that you intend to broaden in your reissue before the 2 year mark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-19631</link>
		<dc:creator>maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 23:16:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-19631</guid>
		<description>There is a kinda a similar Q on Exam Oct 2000AM Q #13:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a kinda a similar Q on Exam Oct 2000AM Q #13:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-19563</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-19563</guid>
		<description>ABCD-&gt; ABC is Broader (b/c the omitted item D makes the claim broader)
AB –&gt;ABC (could be broader or narrower depending on how C is written).

BUT, when one aspect of an application is broader, then the whole application is considered “Broader” by the PTO even if there are additional narrowing changes as well.

Answer would be (A) Give up you are barred from broadening application (b/ca over two years)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABCD-&gt; ABC is Broader (b/c the omitted item D makes the claim broader)<br />
AB –&gt;ABC (could be broader or narrower depending on how C is written).</p>
<p>BUT, when one aspect of an application is broader, then the whole application is considered “Broader” by the PTO even if there are additional narrowing changes as well.</p>
<p>Answer would be (A) Give up you are barred from broadening application (b/ca over two years)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maggie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-19561</link>
		<dc:creator>Maggie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-19561</guid>
		<description>ABC-&gt; ABCD is Broader than ABCD (b/c omitted item make claim broader)
AB --&gt;ABC (could be broader or narrower depending on how C is written). 

BUT, when one aspect of an application is broader then the whole application is considered &quot;Broader&quot; by the PTO even if there are additional narrowing changes as well.

Answer would be (A) Give up you are barred from broadening application</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ABC-&gt; ABCD is Broader than ABCD (b/c omitted item make claim broader)<br />
AB &#8211;&gt;ABC (could be broader or narrower depending on how C is written). </p>
<p>BUT, when one aspect of an application is broader then the whole application is considered &#8220;Broader&#8221; by the PTO even if there are additional narrowing changes as well.</p>
<p>Answer would be (A) Give up you are barred from broadening application</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kforsythe</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-17956</link>
		<dc:creator>Kforsythe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:54:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-17956</guid>
		<description>I am still a little confused about when you can continue with a reissue after the 2 year mark. Am I correct that if you start the reissue withint 2 years, you can then add additional broadening materials after the 2 years because you have started the process within the 2 year reissue timeframe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am still a little confused about when you can continue with a reissue after the 2 year mark. Am I correct that if you start the reissue withint 2 years, you can then add additional broadening materials after the 2 years because you have started the process within the 2 year reissue timeframe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kforsythe</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-17955</link>
		<dc:creator>Kforsythe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-17955</guid>
		<description>I too would go with Patrick that the 2 year limit controls here on permitting reisssue. Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I too would go with Patrick that the 2 year limit controls here on permitting reisssue. Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbie</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-15519</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 18:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-15519</guid>
		<description>To ryan&#039;s comment on Overworkked&#039;s variant question, if the applicant is wanting to submit claim ABC and he already has claim AB and ABCD, I understand that ABC would be narrower than AB, but it would be broader than ABCD, so if the applicant&#039;s patent issued 3 years ago, wouldn&#039;t that be a broadening reissue (from ABCD to ABC)?  In which case he would still be out of luck because it&#039;s past the 2 year mark...I&#039;m with Patrick on this one.

Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To ryan&#8217;s comment on Overworkked&#8217;s variant question, if the applicant is wanting to submit claim ABC and he already has claim AB and ABCD, I understand that ABC would be narrower than AB, but it would be broader than ABCD, so if the applicant&#8217;s patent issued 3 years ago, wouldn&#8217;t that be a broadening reissue (from ABCD to ABC)?  In which case he would still be out of luck because it&#8217;s past the 2 year mark&#8230;I&#8217;m with Patrick on this one.</p>
<p>Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-14128</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 23:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-14128</guid>
		<description>Tricky, tricky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tricky, tricky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-11774</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 17:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-11774</guid>
		<description>Like Overworkked stated, the key to this is understanding that broadening is in the context of every claim in the issued patent. Claim ABC will be narrower than Claim AB. This is permissible so long as you do not disclaim Claim AB prior to amending to add Claim ABC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like Overworkked stated, the key to this is understanding that broadening is in the context of every claim in the issued patent. Claim ABC will be narrower than Claim AB. This is permissible so long as you do not disclaim Claim AB prior to amending to add Claim ABC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-11771</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/05/04/q4-tribell/#comment-11771</guid>
		<description>How can (B) be correct if the patent issued more than three years ago and you can&#039;t file for a broadening reissue beyond two years from the date the patent issues? If the patent issued three years ago, this person appears to be out of luck (i.e., answer (A) give up)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can (B) be correct if the patent issued more than three years ago and you can&#8217;t file for a broadening reissue beyond two years from the date the patent issues? If the patent issued three years ago, this person appears to be out of luck (i.e., answer (A) give up)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

