<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Q) Titanium Baseball (MPEP 2100, Public Use or Printed Publication)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/02/question-2052-titanium-baseball/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/02/question-2052-titanium-baseball/</link>
	<description>Patent Bar Review and Study Guide</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 03:15:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lily</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/02/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-24838</link>
		<dc:creator>lily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 16:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-24838</guid>
		<description>Seems like people have only been getting Variant 2 (july 4th, cataloged/indexed).  Has anyone gotten variant 1 (public use)? what is the answer to that one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems like people have only been getting Variant 2 (july 4th, cataloged/indexed).  Has anyone gotten variant 1 (public use)? what is the answer to that one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricky</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/02/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-20355</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 06:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-20355</guid>
		<description>MPEP2128--&quot; available to the extent that persons interested and ordinarily skilled in the subject matter or art, exercising reasonable diligence, can locate it.” will make a 102(a).

Therefore my concusion is

1. For a publication in library, audience must be those with interest to make a publication 102(a). The question posted by Alex clearly states that &quot;The members of the club were wealthy individuals who were baseball fans, but had no interest in the design, development, manufacture, use, or sale of baseballs.&quot; Therefore the paper is not 102(a). IF without this statement, it will became 102(a) on Jan 2004, when being catalogued under subject.

2. . For public display/uese, any audience, no matter with interest or not, will make it 102(b), of course the timemust be more than one eyar ago. As in variant 1.

any comments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MPEP2128&#8211;&#8221; available to the extent that persons interested and ordinarily skilled in the subject matter or art, exercising reasonable diligence, can locate it.” will make a 102(a).</p>
<p>Therefore my concusion is</p>
<p>1. For a publication in library, audience must be those with interest to make a publication 102(a). The question posted by Alex clearly states that &#8220;The members of the club were wealthy individuals who were baseball fans, but had no interest in the design, development, manufacture, use, or sale of baseballs.&#8221; Therefore the paper is not 102(a). IF without this statement, it will became 102(a) on Jan 2004, when being catalogued under subject.</p>
<p>2. . For public display/uese, any audience, no matter with interest or not, will make it 102(b), of course the timemust be more than one eyar ago. As in variant 1.</p>
<p>any comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KF</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/02/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-20229</link>
		<dc:creator>KF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 18:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-20229</guid>
		<description>Anyone had this more recently?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone had this more recently?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BigBadVoodoDaddy</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/02/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-13124</link>
		<dc:creator>BigBadVoodoDaddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 23:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-13124</guid>
		<description>Would an advertisement count as public use (display) if that was a choice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would an advertisement count as public use (display) if that was a choice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Freds</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/02/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-11428</link>
		<dc:creator>Freds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2011 09:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-11428</guid>
		<description>I think the key to public access test to determine publication date for 102(a)/(b) purpose is accessibility to any member of the public. If the library is just open to wealthy patrons, that&#039;s probably not public accessible within the meaning of the public access under 102(a)/(b) identity rule. That said, I think this is really a poor fact pattern. How long is the article? Could it be remembered by anybody who read it ?

As to the public use variant, the 2133 II A.2 has a large qualification &quot;if the invention is otherwise used  in its natural and intended way and the larger machine or article is accessible to the public&quot;.  Is the baseball, sitting on a museum display, used in its natural and intended way? Again poor fact patten.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the key to public access test to determine publication date for 102(a)/(b) purpose is accessibility to any member of the public. If the library is just open to wealthy patrons, that&#8217;s probably not public accessible within the meaning of the public access under 102(a)/(b) identity rule. That said, I think this is really a poor fact pattern. How long is the article? Could it be remembered by anybody who read it ?</p>
<p>As to the public use variant, the 2133 II A.2 has a large qualification &#8220;if the invention is otherwise used  in its natural and intended way and the larger machine or article is accessible to the public&#8221;.  Is the baseball, sitting on a museum display, used in its natural and intended way? Again poor fact patten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inessa</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/02/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-8287</link>
		<dc:creator>Inessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Mar 2011 23:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-8287</guid>
		<description>I had this on today&#039;s exam and chose July 4th as priority date because that&#039;s when it was indexed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had this on today&#8217;s exam and chose July 4th as priority date because that&#8217;s when it was indexed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/02/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-8142</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 22:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-8142</guid>
		<description>I had this today and selected July 4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had this today and selected July 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: YesUCan</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/02/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-7839</link>
		<dc:creator>YesUCan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 09:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-7839</guid>
		<description>Got variant 2, picked 7/4 and passed on 2/17</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got variant 2, picked 7/4 and passed on 2/17</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patti</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/02/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-7811</link>
		<dc:creator>Patti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-7811</guid>
		<description>I was wondering for variant 1 (public use) of the question, did we all agree it was the following date:

June 25: put in library open only to wealthy museum patrons, none of whom have skill in the art</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering for variant 1 (public use) of the question, did we all agree it was the following date:</p>
<p>June 25: put in library open only to wealthy museum patrons, none of whom have skill in the art</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patti</title>
		<link>http://mypatentbar.com/2007/05/02/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-7810</link>
		<dc:creator>Patti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentbar.wordpress.com/2007/10/17/question-2052-titanium-baseball/#comment-7810</guid>
		<description>I agree with Ve and Brandon if you get the printed publication variant of the question.  The date is for sure July 4 because I checked it in the PTO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Ve and Brandon if you get the printed publication variant of the question.  The date is for sure July 4 because I checked it in the PTO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

